| free hosting image hosting hosting reseller online album e-shop famous people | ||
![]() ![]() |
||
PLEASE FILE AT ONCE
EMBARGO until December 04, 1998 - 12:01am
Dossier No. : JAN/48/95
Distribution:
Judicial Court Exhibit
United States of America Government
Attn: The Honorable,
U. S. President William Jefferson Clinton
Jacques ANTENEN
U. S. Vice President Albert Gore, Jr.
U. S. Attorney General Janet Reno
CANTON DE VAUD
United States Senate
Juge D'Instruction
United States House of Representatives
Du Canton De Vaud
U. S. Department of State
Valentin 34
United States Department of the Treasury
1014 Lausanne
Internal Revenue ServiceSwitzerland
Central Intelligence Agency
U. S. Federal Bureau of Investigation
New Republic/USA Financial Group, Ltd
Gesellschaft (Austria)
AmeriTrust Corporation, Inc. / AmeriTrust
(Suisse) Societe
WhiteCloud Petroleum Corporation (Delaware)
To:
Carrard, Paschoud, Heim &
Associes
Avocats au Barreau
8, rue de la Grotte
1003, Lausanne, Switzerland
Telefon : 41 21 341 90.40
Telefax : 41 21 341.90.50
Attention of :- Monsieur Felix Paschoud, Avocat
In the matter of: AmeriTrust Corporation
account / Ambassador Leo
Emil Wanta, SDR Diplomatic
Passport No. 04362 /
Ambassador Giovanni Ferro,
dated November 23,
1998, received November
27, 1998 - as to Suisse
Court Examination, scheduled
for 04 December 1998
with The Honorable, J
Antenen, under the Dossier No.
JAN/48/95, Canton de Vaud,
Juge D'Instruction,
Valentin 34, 1014
Lausanne, Switzerland, regarding
the following pertinent
classified and sensitive
USGovernment (USG)
information Ö..
1/20
WHEREAS, The President of the United States
of America, having signed
H. R. 3723 on October 11, 1996,
has protected this transaction by allowing
Corporations the right to declare their Contracts,
Clients, Internal Procedures
and Information, and the transactions they
engage in as a Corporate or Trade
Secret fully protected under the Economic
and Industrial Espionage Laws of
the United States of America and the
International Economic Community.
INASMUCH, the names, identities,
bank coordinates and other identifying
information of persons or entities that are
party to this transaction, contained
herein, or learned hereafter,
shall be a Corporate Trade Secret that shall not
be disseminated other than as provided for
herein, or as allowed under
applicable law. Any unauthorized
Disclosure of this Private Transaction,
parties to, or other material
fact of, shall subject the violator(s) to
Criminal Prosecution.
HAVING SAID THAT, I have
obtained a limited release to protect the
AmeriTrust Corporation, Inc. and its
Corporate Officers named above, as
this particular USA Corporation
- with other USG corporations to be
named later
- was duly organized under U.S.C.A. Title 18, Section 6,
which reads:-
USCA Title 18° Sec 6 - Department
and Agency defined
includes any department, independent establishment,
commission,
administration, authority, board
or bureau of the United States or any
corporation in which United States has a
proprietary interest, Ö..
June 25, 1948, c. 645, 62 Stat 685)
11) [ the phrase
" corporation" in which the United States has a
proprietary interest
is intended to include those governmental
corporations in
which stock is not actually issued, as well as
those in which stock
is owned by the United States.]
5. Defenses
if a department or agency has colorable authority
to do what
it is doing,
constitutionality of statute or order requiring keeping of
records, furnishing
of information ---------- (Humble Oil & Refinery
Co. vs SCA
NM 1952, 198F 2d 753, certiorari denied 73 Sct 328,
344 US 909,
97 Ed 701)
2/20
We must learn to subvert, sabotage,
and destroy our enemies
by more sophisticated, and more
effective methods than those
used against us ÖÖÖ.
As we are facing an implacable enemy
whose avowed objective
is world domination by whatever means
and at whatever cost Ö
Points of truthful information :
The USGovernment and AmeriTrust
Corporation, Inc. entered into a
Buy/Sell Contract with
Humewood Enterprises of London and Dublin
to
facilitate the bank to
bank delivery of Credit-Worthy Bank Guarantees with
Rothschild Bank, Banque Paribas,
Lloyds Bank, et al with USG / AmeriTrust
retaining Credit Suisse Bank Senior Management
and FGI Fiduciarie-conseil of
Lasaunne as the corporate fiduciary agent
with Credit Suisse Groupe, on behalf
of AmeriTrust; and per Vincent
Foster, Jr., Deputy White House Counsel to
corporately organize the
Suisse Holding Groupe - registered AmeriTrust
(Suisse) Societe, Geneve,
Switzerland and our Suisse residency per
USG
directives, and we can not assist your court
with highly confidential data relative to
Attorney Foster's Irrevocable Bank Payment
Orders in the aggregate USDollar
amount of US$250,000,000.00, and issued
in favour of The Children's Defense
Fund, Washington, DC, USA - as
We, AmeriTrust, have no working and/or
personal knowledge of any Money Laundering
schemes, as falsely alleged - but,
We can advise this
Suisse Judicial Court that under a
certain Commercial
Contract, L H Finance (Mossah)
agreed to issue a Surety Bond for
US$250,000.00 as a condition of said contract;
and then advised AmeriTrust that
they would release US$375,000.00 as
a Cash Deposit Performance Guarantee,
allowing US$125,000.00 to
cover Introduction Fees to Deputy White House
Counsel Vince Foster, Jr., but
only through the Suisse Fiduciary Agent - Ms
Elaine Guiraud, at the Union Bank of
Switzerland, Account No. 320.904.60W
on or about June 22, 1993 prior
to Mr Foster's scheduled arrival at Hotel de la
Paix, Geneve on July 7,
1993 per previous financial arrangements.
As the monetary disbursal was arranged through
a Ms Lorrayne Fine, Principal of
L H Finance, as the required
Performance Bond was submitted in the event of their
Non-Performance per the Commercial Contract,
prepared with Mr Foster - and
presently in the Court's possession -
allowing due to their non-performance the
USDollar amounts to be disbursed as follows:
Mr Vincent Foster, Jr.,
Esq. USDollars 125,000.00
AmeriTrust Corporation, Inc.
USDollars 250,000.00
3/20
Article 29 - Personal Inviolability
The person of a diplomatic agent shall be
inviolable. He shall not be liable to any form of
arrest or detention. The receiving
State shall treat him with due respect and shall take all
appropriate steps to prevent any attack on
his person, freedom or dignity.
Article 31 - Immunity from Jurisdiction
4/20
Furthermore,
Diplomatic personal baggage were unlawfully seized, and never
returned under
Article 36 of the Vienna Convention.
Article 40 - Duties of Third States
1. If a diplomatic agent
passes through or is in the territory of a third state,
which has granted
him a passport visa if such visa
was necessary, while
proceeding to take
up or to return to his post, or when returning to his own
country, the
third state shall accord him inviolability
and such other
immunities as
may be required to ensure his transit
or return.
See exhibits, which include the diplomatic correspondence of :-
U. S. President William Jefferson Clinton
to Ambassador Leo Wanta, dated
20 December 20, 1994,
U. S. Vice President Albert Gore, Jr.
to Ambassador Leo Wanta, dated
January 3, 1995,
State of Israel, Ministry of Internal Affairs
INVITATION dated July 31, 1997
and addressed to The Honorable, Ambassador
Leo E Wanta to discuss Israeli
matters of State and the Region.
Please take Special Notice Ö..
On November 03, 1993, the Prime
Minister of the State of Israel - The
Honorable, Yitzhak Rabin after several
Israeli demands of the Suisse
Federation to release Ambassador Leo
Emil Wanta, The Executive
Chairman/Director of AmeriTrust, Inc.
presently occupying Suisse Dungeon Cell No.
130, within Prison du Bois -
Mermet, CH du Bois - Gentil, 1018 Lausanne,
Switzerland, relative to
AmeriTrust to release the negotiated deposits
to the Prime Minister's Bureau,
Jerusalem, Israel, as USG
authorizations for the existing Israeli /
Palestinian Peace Programme Funding
and Development Projects, in
the Suisse Court's possession and / or
concealment.
It is interesting to note that the very day
the Israeli Government sends me a
coded message on 16 November 1993;
I am immediately taken by Suisse
gunpoint and physical body restraints
to Swiss Air for immediate
extradition departure to New York,
yet another U. S. Federal and
International violation in your court records.
JUST HOW MANY INNOCENT HUMAN LIVES
MUST BE SACRIFICED FOR THE PERSONAL,
MONETARY AND POLITICAL GAINS AND INTERNATIONAL
POWER PLAYS AGAINST GLOBAL
HUMANITY WITH TOTAL FREEDOM AND LIBERTY
BY
5/20
The United States Internal
Revenue Service addresses me for Corporate
Income Tax purposes, as "Attn:
Ambassador L Wanta" no legitimate Court
has ever lawfully revoked my Diplomatic status,
nor as the Somali Democratic
Government - Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
In my personal case - I was unlawfully arrested
for failure to pay Wisconsin
"non-residency taxes" while working as the
Ambassador to Switzerland and
Chairman-designate to the Somali Central
Bank, while in the Sovereign Country
of Switzerland, unlawfully detained in a
Suisse dungeon - for 134 days
without a U.S. Constitutional "SPEEDY TRIAL",
forcibly drugged which
developed into a serious HEART condition
diagnosed as RBBB - Right Bundle
Branch (Electrical) Block, as the State of
Wisconsin refuses to release
certain illegally seized USDollar corporate
funds to obtain a very needed
Pacemaker and imprisoned me to unlawfully
pay under state extortion and
intimidation with CIA/Corporate funding for
the third time, a State of
Wisconsin civil tax assessment for 1982 and
non-residency year of 1988, [see
Original Certificate of Divorce or Annulment,
Court Case No. 95FA445,
adjudicating that my last day of legal residence
in the Sovereign State of
Wisconsin was prior to July, 1988]
- as the alleged state civil tax
assessments were legally paid and settled
in full satisfaction TWICE in 1992
for USDollar 14,129.00 each, as a Central
Intelligence Agency/Corporate
nuisance tax assessment, resulting I personally
believe in the Murder of
White House Deputy Counsel Vince Foster and
Freddie Woodruff, a CIA Case
Officer involved with AmeriTrust and New
Republic/USA Financial Group,
Gessellschaft Ltd, Wien, Austria and with
full working knowledge of certain
Intel operations/surveillance funded by AmeriTrust,
Aneko Credit Pte Limited,
Asian-Europa Development Group, Ltd, and
other USCA 18 / Sec 6 USG operations:
USG sanctioned interference in the "Domestic
Affairs" of the former Soviet
Union (USSR) ruble (SUR) currency,
Gold currency certificates and delivery
of 2,000 metric tonnes of Soviet gold bullion
via USSR Central Bank directly
to New Republic/USA Financial Group Ltd Ges.m.b.H.
for smelting to 12.5 kgs
Gold bars in order to:-
De-stabilize the USSR Military Establishment,
KGB/Stasi operations
and
the Soviet Union economy, in favour of Boris
Yeltsin Groupe,
Control and identify the Soviet Union FUSION BOMB development,
6/20
USG sanctioned Intel findings
by New Republic/USA (Austria) of
Iraqi purchases and deliveries
of USSR/Bulgaria RED MERCURY (RM 2020)
through T. A. Trace Lab Analysis of Morges,
Switzerland
coordinated by Suisse Dr. John Lutz,
et al; and in conjunction with
USSR Envoy Millie Ferrus of Lausanne, Switzerland,
resulting in Suisse
Cooperation and funding AGAINST THE
AMERICAN / FOREIGN COALITION involved
in the Iraq / Kuwait conflict, inter
alia,
Meccanotechnia Industries (Singapore) of Fiat-Valsella
( Italia ) military
Production of LANDMINES, delivered to the
Iraqi Military for defense against
the American Coalition Armed Forces, as discovered
by INTEL operations of
Aneko Credit Pte Limited (Singapore)/USCA18
/ 6 ops.,
USG Intel.ops discovering "BLUE
MOON" operation, under Blue
Moon
Bags of Thailand and approval for our INTEL.ops to target for
Full
field investigation [ but later to learn that their drug operation
was
Known
and protected by U. S. Customs Attache assigned
to U.S.
Embassy
in the Republic of Singapore - working in association with
our
previous U. S Treasury / U. S. Customs Internal Affairs target
within
the Little Rock / Mena Night Flight operations]
- as to
illegal
distribution of controlled substances of Heroin and Cocaine,
etc.
VIA Burma, Thailand, Malaysia, Singapura railway
operations
with
Blue Moon operatives / mules; for covert international delivery
to Europa
/ North American distribution. This INTEL.ops
was
coordinated
by U. S. Treasury Department INTEL Field Operatives -
a. Frank B Ingram, SA32NV;
b. Rick Reynolds,
SA233MS;
c. Lee E Wanta,
Falconbird / Stillpoint
with assistance of Sector
V Operations and Internal Affairs under
S - 31 - IANO USGovernment
authority and control,
Unlawful U. S. Treasury Certificate
traffic investigation in South East
Asia, coordinated by SA233MS and SA32NV,
with U. S. Secret Service Agents Bob
Twohig and Rick Zainos,
et al - in Bangkok, Thailand,
USG Intel.ops coordinated by New Republic/USA
(Austria) expose of
Italia/Soviet Mafiosa, thwarted by Austrian/Singapura
INTEL.ops, as
listed in Thieves World, Simon &
Schuster (1994) demonstrating the
7/20
USG "Security Code - NEW REPUBLIC" of USCA
18 / 6 Jackson,
Mississippi, INTEL.ops
legally organized as New Republic / USA
Financial Group, Ltd.
to coordinate U. S. Vice President George
Herbert Walker Bush implementation
of:-
Contra funding v Boland Amendment,
with canal barge deliveries;
POM (Arkansas) sub-assemblies
and covert production and related
parts to COLAS (Honduras)
final assembly operations; Arkansas
Development Finance Authority
(ADFA) with Chairman Bob Nash
under Operation: DEALROOM
with Bank of China FOREX of
Japanese Yen and USDollars with Arkansas
Pension Funding to the
People's Republic of China
(PRC.ops), with US Attorney General
Bill Barr / CIA.ops / DOD.ops (see
field reports of RAC Wm Lecates
and Frank B Ingram (Sector 5),
as copied to USSS Director John Magaw
and SAC Glen Speedy, et
al, ; including the Browning Arms Sale and
Delivery of certain weapons
through Arab Associates and Ronald Arab,
Vancouver, British Columbia,
Canada to the Panama Groupe protected by
then Vice President Bush, per
USGovernment STING operation headed and
coordinated by USG INTEL operative
Leo Wanta and SA32NV - Frank B Ingram
via Corpus Christi U. S. Customs Operations,
under USGovn Case numbers
relative to Boland Amendment and other
U. S. Federal arms and smuggling
violations; ref: USGovn case numbers
in Wanta/Ingram/Lecates USGovernment
authorized Field reports, and
U. S. Federal Court records in Corpus
Christi, Texas Region.
MX Mobile Missile mobilization
/ deployment activities of New
Republic/USA (Mississippi.ops)
to purchase the Santa Fe / Southern
8/20
New Republic/USA purchase
of USSR Mig 29 FULCRUM
maintenance manuals for U. S. Air Force
OSI operations, like a true
copy, certainly qualified this
writer as an American operative once
again, as well
as the Soviet HIND aircraft recovery
operations,
Aneko Credit Pte Ltd
covert investigation of Motorola SECTEL
Sales and delivery to Iran Security
Operations via Singapura/Malaysia,
Yongbyon, North Korea "nuclear chip"
manufacturing, developed by
Singapore
Technologies for sister plants in North Korea & Singapura,
as
financed by VIOLA TRADING LIMITED, Andras Szasz
and
George
Soros Groupe of Sovereign House, Station Road, St John, Isle
of Man
- Registration No. 41992, Isle of Man, as well as diesel oil and
other
procurement of previously EMBARGOED commodities.
Kuwait Dinar FOREX as sanctioned by
USGovernment programmes
Utilizing the INSLAW, Inc. PROMIS
software, inter alia, and much
much more for absolute
proof that, We, AmeriTrust and
our
corporate officers are
real victims of Criminal Conspiracy by others,
enjoying their current
freedom at our expense and displeasure, but
certainly for their
PERSONAL GAIN and Abuse / Misuse of Power
without merit,
Recovery of stolen / cancelled
Chase Manhattan Bank and Citibank Bank
Guarantees by unknown persons
being negotiated within the
Suisse Banking
Community, and AmeriTrust finder's fee for recovery
of said Bank
Instruments and lawful prosecution of the alleged criminal
perpetrators
under USGovernment Security code : Chaselet.
Based on my diplomatic
situation, I was kidnapped in
Switzerland and taken to New York at gunpoint,
and appeared in the United
States District Court, Eastern District of
New York, USA, Docket No.
93-M-2072; whereas the Court dismissed
any and all unlawful / alleged
complaints of the State of
Wisconsin, based on USGovernment Motion as
to Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta - whereas
the State of Wisconsin - Department
of Revenue DEFIED said
U. S. Federal Order and
had me re-arrested
in New York City with only my Diplomatic
Entry / VISA without any valid ARREST
WARRANT, for continuous REFUSAL to
pay a WISCONSIN CIVIL TAX
ASSESSMENT of a STATE NON-RESIDENT.
( see enclosed New York exhibits for
verification of diplomatic status)
However, the State
of New York unlawfully held me
incognito within their Department
of Corrections, and listed
immediately as an AMBASSADOR
after United States Secret
Service notification and confirmation.
9/20
The State of Wisconsin clearly violated 26
U.S.C. , Sec 7201 as to illegally
extraditing Ambassador Wanta, to his "non-resident"
State of Wisconsin, USA -
since June 30, 1988 - for alleged civil state
tax deficiencies for 1982 and
1988, per the defective Arrest Warrant served
in Switzerland by the U.S.
State Department Vice Consul Carlos Medina,
Berne, contrary to the Suisse/USA
Treaty provisions, among other things,
which include:-
Excluded court evidence in favour of Ambassador
Wanta
Excluded evidence of USGovernment liability
Excluded proof that a legitimate tax deficiency
lawfully existed
No exclusive proof that a real tax crime
ever existed
Please note : An American taxpayer-defendant
has a right to establish as a
defense that he owed no tax in addition to
what he had paid, (see
United States v Moody, 339 F.2d 161, 162
(6th Cir. 1964).
Quote - The government has no authority for
its startling contention that an
IRS assessment is conclusive proof in a criminal
trial that taxes were in
fact owing.
As the Supreme Court said in United States
Martin Linen Supply Co., 430 U.S.
564, 572-733 1977), the jury's
overriding responsibility is to stand
between the accused and a potentially arbitrary
or abusive government that is
in command of the criminal sanction. For
this reason, a trial judge is
prohibited from entering a judgment of conviction
or directing a jury to
come forward with such
a verdict,
regardless of how overwhelming the evidence
may point in that direction.
This conclusion is consistent with United
States v England, where the
government conceded that proof of a valid
assessment was essential to its
evasion case, an he court held it was in
error to instruct the jury the
assessment was valid as a matter of law.
347 F. 2d at 430. England was
followed in United States v Goetz, 746 F.
2d 705, 708-10 (11th Cir. 1984).
[The Court's] Our conclusion is also consistent
with decisions that the
taxpayer may defend a charge of willfully
evading the assessment of taxes by
proving there was no tax due and owing,
for example, by evidence of
unclaimed deductions and expenses. See, e..
Clark v United States, 211 F 2d
100, 13 (8th Cir. 1954), ÖÖ But
conclusive presumptions are invalid in
criminal cases because they "conflict with
the overriding presumption of
innocence with which extends to every element
of the crime, and would invade
10/20
For the foregoing reasons, [the court] we
conclude that one accused of tax
evasion must have the opportunity to prove,
however unlikely the proposition
may be, that an administratively final tax
assessment does not accurately
reflect the existence of a tax deficiency.
Therefore, [defendant] is entitled
to a new trial at which he may introduce
evidence relevant to whether there
was in fact a tax deficiency in one or more
of the tax years in question.
However, [the court] we agree with cases holding
that, while an assessment
may be used to prove a tax deficiency in
a payment evasion case, an
assessment is nota necessary element of a
payment evasion charge. See Hogan,
861 F. 2d at 315-16; Dack, 47 F 2d at 1174,
Voorhies, 658 F 2d at 714-15.
Therefore, it can be readily established that
the Suisse Judicial authorities
were lawlessly mislead by the Suisse,
United States and State of
Wisconsin provocateurs to unconstitutionally
deny me, my personal freedom
and liberty by American Birthright,
as well as the Vienna Convention
Articles, inter alia.
Please note: The State of Wisconsin
of the United States of America admits
they "uttered/altered" the civil NON-RESIDENCY
state tax returns in favor of
the Department of Revenue, in order
to seek the fraudulent state arrest
warrant by illegally manipulating the Suisse
Federation, Suisse Surete and
their Judicial System, U.S. State Department
and the U.S. Federal Bureau of
Investigation, et al; contrary to U.S.C.A.
Title 18,
Section 4 - Misprision of Felony
Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission
of a felony cognizable by
a court of the United States, conceals and
does not as soon as possible make
known the same to some judge or other person
in civil or military authority
under the United States, shall be fined not
more than $500 or imprisoned not
more than three years, or both. (June
25, 1948, c. 645, 62 Stat 684)
Elements of offense - Generally
Ö. are concealment
of something, such as suppression of the evidence or other
positive act, and
failure to disclose (Neal v U. S., cc A Minn, 1939, 102F 2d 643)
Knowledge of commission of felony
Ö. it is immaterial whether government
did or did not know of crime or who
the perpetrator was ( Lacey v U. S.
C. A. Cal 1966, 356F 2d 07, certiorari
denied 87 Sct 234, 385 US 922, 172 Ed 2d145)
11/20
Indictment or Information
Indictment alleging that specified person
committed offense cognizable by
courts of United States, that defendant
had knowledge of actual commission
of such offense, that defendant willfully
concealed crime, and that
defendant did not as soon as possible make
known commission of crime to
authorities was sufficient to charge offense
of misprision of a felony
notwithstanding failure to allege evidentiary
details of concealment. (US v
Sullivan, DC Okl 1968, 284 Supp 574)
Venue
Ö.. was place where report of
felony should have been made (Bratton v USCCA
Okl, 1934, 73 F 2d 795)
Evidence
Ö. Evidence in prosecution for
misprision of a felony must establish
affirmative act of concealment, and mere
silence without some affirmative act
is insufficient to authorize conviction.
(US v Sullivan, DC Okl 1968, 284 F
Supp 579)
Please note : The necessary evidence is now
established by this current
Suisse Court Action for the State of Wisconsin
- Department of Revenue
suggested to the Suisse authorities that
the STATE is willing to disburse
certain corporate funds to the Suisse counterparts
for their participation in
this absolute Fraud on the U. S. Federal
Courts, The Suisse Courts and
Wisconsin non-jurisdictional subject matter
courts of record, among other
lawless activities by others, as demonstrated
by the U. S. Federal Bureau of
Investigation DISCLAIMERS of their official
role at the behest of the State
of Wisconsin - to falsely accuse this American
citizen and International
Diplomat in the court records In Wisconsin,
as well as the Suisse and United States District
Courts, and Media
Journalists.
Section 10 - Interstate Commerce and Foreign Commerce defined
Section 11 - Foreign Government
defined
My lawless Suisse Extradition is in direct
violation of my issued Somali
Diplomatic Credentials which have not been
revoked by any Government,
among other things.
The term " FOREIGN GOVERNMENT", as used
in this title, includes any
government, faction, or body of insurgents
within a country with which the
United States is at peace, irrespective
of recognition by the United States.
(June 25, 1948, c 645, 63 Stat 686)
12/20
Section 35 - Imparting or conveying
false information
Whoever imparts or conveys or cause to be
imparted or conveyed false
information, knowing the information to be
false, concerning an attempt or
alleged attempt being made, to do any act
which would be a crime prohibited
by this chapterÖ..
Whoever willfully and maliciously, or with
reckless disregard for the safety
of human life, imparts or conveys or causes
to be imparted or conveyed false
information, knowing the information to be
false, concerning an attempt or
alleged attempt being made or to be made
to do any act which would be a crime
prohibited.. ( Added July 14, 156, c 595,
Sec 1, 70 Stat 540, and amended Oct
3, 1961, Pub L. 87-338, 75 Stat 75;
July 7, 1965, Pub. L 89-64, 79 Stat 210 )
Constitutionality
This section making criminal imparting of
information known to be false
concerning attempt or alleged attempt to
do act which would be crime
prohibited by this chapter was not unconstitutionally
vague where it clearly
applies to facts of facts of particular case.
(US v Rutherford, CA,NY, 1964,
332 F2d 444, certiorari denied 84 Sct 1922,
377 US 994, 12 L Ed 2d1046)
Statements within Section
Ficticious as well as false reports were
intended to be covered by this section.
(U. S. v Allen, C. A.
Conn, 1963, 317 F 2d 777)
3. Sufficiency
Evidence sustained conviction for violation
of this section proscribing,
imparting or conveying false information.
(US v Rutherford, CA NY 1964, 332
F 2d 444, certiorari denied 845 ct 1922,
377 US 994, 12 L Ed 2d 1046)
Section 241 - Conspiracy against rights
of citizens
If two or more persons conspire to injure,
oppress, threaten, or intimidate
any citizen in the free exercise or enjoyment
of any right or privilege
secured to him by the Constitution or laws
of the United States or because of
his having so exercised the same;
Constitutionality
This section pertaining to conspiracy against
rights of citizens encompasses
due process and equal protection clauses
of USCA Const Amend 14 and is not
13/20
CONGRESS HAS THE POWER TO PROTECT THE CITIZEN
IN THE EXERCISE OF RIGHTS
CONFERRED BY THE CONSTITUTION.
(Ex parte Yarborough,
Ga 1884, 4 Sct 152, 110 US 651, 28 L Ed 274)
The word "conspire", as found in this section,
making conspiracy against the
rights of citizens a crime, is equivalent
to the word "willfully", and thus
this section is not unconstitutional for
being vague or failing to state as ascertainable
standard of guilt, nor is an indictment
thereunder charging that persons did
conspire for such purpose defective, on theory
that it does not allege an
intent to commit offense. Id.
Rationale behind creation of crime of conspiracy
to violate State and Federal
laws was belief by Congress that mere agreement
among members of persons to
commit an offense was itself a danger to
society demanding classification of
a crime, and although an overt act
is necessary for conviction, it is not
necessary to prove that conspiracy was successful.
(U. S. v Bonanno, DC NY
1960, 180 F Supp 71)
Title 18, United States Code - Section 1201
(Chapter 55) - Kidnapping
Whoever unlawfully seizes, confines, inveigles,
decoys, kidnaps, abducts, or
carries away and holds for ransom or reward
or otherwise any person, except
in the case
of a minor by the parent thereof, when:
the person is willfully transported in interstate
or foreign commerce;
any such act against the person is done within
the special maritime and
territorial jurisdiction of the United States;
any such act against the person is done within
the special aircraft
jurisdiction of the United States as defined
in Section 101 (36) of the
Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amended
( 49 USC 1301 (36)); or
the person is a foreign official, an
internationally protected person, or
an official guest as those terms are defined
in section 1116 (b) of this
title, shall be punished by imprisonment
for any term of years or for life.
With respect to subsection (a) (1), above,
the failure to release the victim
within twenty-four
hours after he shall have been unlawfully seized, confined,
inveigled,
decoyed, kidnapped, abducted, or carried away shall create a
rebuttable
presumption that such person has been transported in interstate or
foreign commerce.
If two or more persons conspire to violate
this section and one or more such
persons do
any overt act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall
be
punished by
imprisonment for any term of years or for life.
14/20
If the victim of an offense under subsection
(a) is an internationally protected
Person, the United States may exercise jurisdiction
over the offense if the
alleged offender is present within the United
States, irrespective of the
place where the offense was committed or
the nationality of the victim or the
alleged offender. [ See Federal Aviation
Act of 1958 as to Gunpoint
Extradition on Swiss Air Commercial aircraft
in United States air/marine
territory. ]
Common Law - At common law, "kidnap" meant
to take any act to carry
a person by force and against his will.
Constitutionality - Terms "kidnap" and "holds
for ransom or reward" or
otherwise in this section proscribing
kidnapping of a foreign official or
internationally protected persons,
did not render this section
unconstitutionally vague.
This section making interstate
kidnapping a crime f victim is held for ransom
or reward " or otherwise" was
intended to reach abductions not motivated by
ransom or reward and its provisions
not unconstitutionally vagueÖ..
situations lacking the involuntariness
of seizure and detention which is the
essence of the crime of kidnappingÖ
Word "kidnap" has a technical meaning, is
derived from the common law, and
must be interpreted in light of its technical
meaning at common law, and,
both under the common law and under this
section, unless clearly modified
means to take and carry away any person by
unlawful force or by fraud and
against his will.
This title/section adequately expressed intention
of Congress to prevent
transportation in interstate or foreign commerce
of persons who were
unlawfully restrained in order that captor
might secure some benefit to
himself.
Ö. was to extend federal jurisdiction
under such former section to persons
who have been kidnapped and held, not
only for reward, but for any other
reason,
Ö. was designed to punish one guilty
of the transportation of a kidnapped
person in interstate commerce where the kidnapping
was done for ransom or
otherwise.
OBJECT OF THIS SECTION AND SECTION 1202 OF
THIS TITLE PROHIBITING
KIDNAPPING IS TO SECURE CITIZEN'S PERSONAL
LIBERTY AND TO SECURE TO THEM THE
ASSISTANCE OF THE LAW NECESSARY
TO RELEASE THEM FROM UNLAWFUL RESTRAINT.
15/20
Elements to be established in Federal Kidnapping
charge are: (1) the
transportation in interstate commerce, (2)
of an unconsented person who is
(3) held for ransom or reward, or otherwise
and (4) doing such acts knowingly
and willfully.
This section prohibits transportation in interstate
commerce of persons who
were being unlawfully restrained in order
that captor might secure some
benefit to himself.
While "kidnapping" at common law means
to forcibly abduct a person and to
carry him from one state into another state,
term involves element of seizing
victim by force or fraud and against his
will.
Purpose of kidnapping need not be for reward or pecuniary gain.
(42) A state may not lawfully try, convict
and punish person brought within
its territorial confines by force and violence
exercised by its officers in violation of
this section. (Collins v Frisbie,
C. A., Mich 1951)
ÖÖ. was not so uncertain that those
accused thereunder would not know that
the charges constituted an offense. (US v
Wilson, DC Mo 1947, 72 F Supp 812,
affirmed 176 F 2d 184, certiorari denied
70 Sct 145, 2 mems, 338 US 870, 94
L Ed 533)
See, CIVIL RIGHTS ACT, USCA 42, SECTION 1981
See, ARTICLE III OF U. S. CONTITUTION
See, VIENNA CONVENTION ON DIPLOMATIC RELATIONS (1961)
See, 1900 USA/SUISSE FEDERAL EXTRADICTION TREATY; ARTICLES I THROUGH XIV
See, TITLE 18, USCA SECTION 1073 AS TO STATE OF WISCONSIN FEDERAL VIOLATIONS AND THEIR OUTRIGHT PERJURY
See, TITLE 28 ( HOBBS ANTI-RACKETEERING ACT)
16/20
s. 976.03, Note 21 - Foreign Countries
International extradition was based on treaties
only, and thus any offense
which was not made extraditable by treaty
between the nations involved was
not an extraditable offense. (14 Op.Atty.Gen
189 (1925))
The matter of extradition {of actual State
of Wisconsin Non-residents} of
fugitives from {Wisconsin non-jurisdictional
subject matter} justice who have
taken refuge in a foreign country is governed
wholly by treaties between the
United States and such country. ( 3
Op.Atty.Gen 830 (1914))
s. 976.03, Note 25 - Fugitive
from Justice - In general
Person should be fugitive from justice in
order to be extradited. (10
Op.Atty.Gen 831 (1921)) See U. S. Federal
Court Dismissal of fraudulently
obtained Fugitive Warrant, manipulated
and issued under State of Wisconsin
as authorized by the future U. S. Presidential
Candidate - Wisconsin
Governor Tommy Thompson, Subterfuge and Perjury.
Section 242 - Deprivation of rights
under Color of Law
Whoever, under color of any law,
statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom,
willfully subjects any inhabitant of any
state, territory or District to the
deprivation of any rights, privileges, or
immunities secured or protected by
the Constitution or Laws of the United States.
Section 371 - Conspiracy to commit offense of to defraud United States
Extortion
An agreement between state law enforcement
officers and others to extort
money from inhabitants of the United States
by causing their arrest and
imprisonment, without justification by such
officers, and under color of
state law, constituted a "CONSPIRACY"
to commit an offense against the
United States in violation of this section
of which Federal District Court
has jurisdiction. (Culp v USCA Ark 1942,
131 F 2 d 93).
As the American Populace fully aware of continuing
"misconduct" in State and
Federal Government - as well as Foreign Nations,
the following must apply:-
Title 18, United States Code - Section 1116
Murder or manslaughter of
foreign officials, official guests, or internationally
protected persons.
As noted above, the State of Wisconsin refused
this writer Medical Care for
my Heart* condition, that they created under
the color of law and perjury,
and continuing to seize/freeze corporate
and
17/20
Whoever kills or attempts to kill a foreign
official, official guest, or
internationally protected person shall be
punished as provided under section
1111,
1112, and 1113 of this title, and any such person who is guilty of
attempted
murder shall be punished for not more than twenty years.
For the purposes of this section:
"Foreign government" means the government
of a foreign country,
irrespective
of recognition by the United States.
"Foreign official" means -
A Chief of State or the political equivalent,
President, Vice President,
Prime Minister,
Ambassador, Foreign Minister, or other officer of
Cabinet rank
or above of a foreign government or the chief executive
officer of
an international organization, or any person who has
previously
served in such capacity, and any member of his family,
while in the
United States; and,
" Internationally protected person" means-
A Chief of State or the political equivalent,
head of government, or Foreign
Minister whenever such person is in a country
other than his own and any
member of his family accompanying him; or
Any other representative, officer, employee,
or agent of the USG, a foreign
government, or international organization
who at the time and place concerned
is entitled pursuant to international law
to special protection against
attack upon his person, freedom, or dignity,
and any member of his family
then forming part of his household.
If the victim of an offense under subsection
(a) is an internationally
protected person, the United States
may exercise jurisdiction over the
offense if the alleged offender is present
within the United States,
irrespective of the place where the offense
was committed or the nationality
of the victim or the alleged offender.
In the course of enforcement of this section
and any other sections
prohibiting a conspiracy or attempt to violate
this section, the Attorney
General may request assistance from any Federal,
State, or local agency,
including the Army, Navy, and Air Force,
any statute, rule, or regulation to
the contrary notwithstanding.
Purpose - Intention of this section was to
implement fulfillment of
obligations of United States under two treaties,
and to do so completely.
4. Conspiracy - In prosecution for conspiracy
to seize and confine a foreign
official,
government was not required to prove either that all the potential
victims were
foreign officials or that defendants had the specific intention of
seizing foreign
officials.
18/20
As before your good offices is authorized
to DEBIT our Suisse Corporate
Account No. 70849 at Banque SCS Alliance,
Geneve, Switzerland for Suisse
francs 10,000 and CREDIT per original
bank instructions, Deputy White House
Counsel Vincent Foster, Jr. fiduciary
account at Credit Suisse Banque for
the amount of USDollars 125,000.00,
under Ms Elaine Guiraud fiduciary
signatory control on behalf of the Suisse
controlled - FGI Fiduciarie-conseil
operations, Lausanne.
Please prepare the suggested proxy to commence
Legal Action against the
Canton of Vaud, Switzerand. Please
notify the Police de Surete of the unreturned 6'940
franc suisses, as well as other personal
belongings and corporate/USGovernment
documentation.
All of my USGovernment actions, including
the U.S.S.R. ruble currency affair
were carried out with the full knowledge
of my superiors. I personally do
not intend to be fraudulently used as a Human
Sacrifice to deny and cover-up
the working knowledge and shared responsibility
of others. Now without any
doubt, we have a conscious USGovernment policy
of ignoring reality.
The American Public needs to learn what is
really happening in the United
States and the Sovereign State of Wisconsin,
so that Civil Tax Laws can be
accountable to a large and informed public,
and not just generated lawlessly
by delusional tax agents, whose judgments
are colored by their personal
needs and biases, under the color of
law. To forcibly DRUG and IMPRISON me
to collect unknown
corporate and personal non-residency income taxes is
grossly CRIMINAL, as well as
a direct violation of my United States
Constitutional, Civil and Diplomatic Rights.
Once upon a time, " a decision which
has long been regarded as the special
province of the Executive Branch" -
charged by the U. S. Constitution to
" TAKE CARE THAT THE LAWS BE FAITHFLLY
EXECUTED."
19/20
The overall cost of closing your eyes
to the State of Wisconsin's Corruption
and Tax Conspiracy by acts of kidnapping/abduction
on foreign sovereign soil
is beyond American traditions of Due Process
and Equal Protection under our
United States Constitution, certainly exposing
the Clinton Administration
complicity and open endorsement.
I was led to believe that at one time,
our United States of America
President William Jefferson Clinton had both
the moral standing and the Presidential
means to " back up" our U. S.
Constitution, our Civil Rights, and Guarded
Privileges, under his personal World
Leadership, based on our USG
sanctioned " De-stabilization of
the Evil Empire."
May God save our Great Nation from inner destruction
and Misuse and Abuse
of Power, contrary to our Democratic
Rule of Law and the U. S. Constitution.
Respectfully yours,
AmeriTrust Corporation, Inc.
By: _______________________________________________
Leo
Emil Wanta, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
LEW:wien.ops/M418.end
From: Ambassador Leo E Wanta
To: Sander Hicks
Vince (Vincent Foster) was in Geneve.. Rec'd USD250,000,000.00
in
"set-aside allocations" in favour of the Children's
Defense Fund.... We were booked at the Hotel de la
Paix/Geneve and lodging guaranteed by his AMEX
card, etc.. per their request for confidentiality and
meetings w/Credit Suisse Banque Officer Marcel
Godal, et al.. incl Chrm Guy Studor, et al; Millie
Ferrus/Elaine Guiraud of FGI Fiduciarie-conseil,
Lausanne....... Brgds, lee