 |
free hosting image hosting hosting reseller online album e-shop famous people |  |
  |
||
|
free hosting image hosting hosting reseller online album e-shop famous people | |
|
||
Friday, May 21st, 1993
ATTORNEY GENERAL JANET RENO
The United States Department of Justice
5th Floor, 10th Street & Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20530
Phone: (202) 514-2001 - Ms. Reno
514-1007 - Carl Stern, Communications Dir
514-3699 - Melissa Muller, Appointments
514-4969 - Richard Scruggs, Asst Atty Ge.
514-4236 - Jam. Kramarsic, Spec.Ops.cia
Re: (1) Vital NEW information concerning the conflagration at David Koresh's Branch Davidian compound, "Ranch Apocalypse," outside WACO, Texas, on Monday, April 19th, 1993, which is now being kept from you and covered up - i.e., that what happened was NOT "mass suicide," but rather a mass murder;
(2) The meaning and significance of this NEW information - particularly with respect to the Justice Department's ongoing WACO investigation, and future indictments and prosecutions - i.e., you are headed totally in the WRONG direction - because Bush Administration holdovers in the Justice Department, along with others tied to the CIA, are preventing you from ever learning the truth about what actually happened in WACO;
(3) The extreme sensitivity of this information, and my specific proposal as to how you should handle it. The lives of key participants, other witnesses, and even MYSELF are now in grave danger as a result of my passing this information on to you. (Paul D. Wilcher was murdered). If you let this information fall into the hands of the wrong persons, some or all of those who know the truth about WACO and are now prepared to come forward and testify could well be "silenced" (i.e., MURDERED) in the very near future;
(4) And the extreme importance of this information to the overall QUALITY of justice under the Clinton Administration, to your own place in history as Attorney General, ... This information, if handled in the manner I (Paul D. Wilcher, Lawyer) have spelled out in detail, presents you and President Clinton with a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to expose, confront, and hopefully ROOT OUT much of the system-wide corruption which has been at the core of the federal government for at least the past 30 years. (Editor's note: Paul David Wilcher did not know that Presi-dent Clinton had been involved for years as governor of Arkansas in the Mena drug and gun running operations; therefore, Clinton and Reno DID NOT WANT the CIA and Justice Department exposed because it would implicate them.)
DEAR ATTORNEY GENERAL RENO:
The purpose of this letter, and of my (Paul David Wilcher, Lawyer) meeting with you (whenever that occurs), is for me to deliver to you extremely sensitive information about the deaths of the 86 men, women, and children who perished at the Branch Davidian compound on Monday, April 19th, 1993, and the truth about HOW it all happened.
[Page 1]
But even more important, my PURPOSE here is to demonstrate how the WACO tragedy fits into a much bigger (and far uglier) picture, and to present my specific, detailed plan as to how you should attack the overall problem at its root causes.
The plan I am offering here is not at all what you might expect, at first glance, for it is far more comprehensive, and deals with far deeper root causes than you have thus far been made aware. Indeed, although you may not realize it, you are still surrounded in the Justice Department, the FBI, the BATF, and elsewhere throughout the government by Reagan-Bush holdovers many of whom are determined that you will NEVER learn about the core issues and ugly truths which I have laid out for you here in some detail.
You are the only person in the federal government empowered to act on these matters. Attorney General Reno -- the only person who can approve and implement the plan I have proposed here. Indeed, the information and plan I am giving you here is so sensitive that if it fall into the hands of some of the wrong Reagan-Bush Holdovers who surround you, a number of people who now want to come forward to testify will be murdered in order to silence their testimony forever.
That is why I have had to insist on speaking to you, Attorney General Reno -- and only to you -- in person, about these matters.
But I am confident that once you have heard my presentation in its entirety, you will agree that our time together has been well-spent and that my information and plan offers to you, to President Clinton, and indeed, to our nation as a whole, a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to attack the system-wide corruption which has been at the core of the federal government for at least the past 30 years, and to bring about the most fundamental and far-reaching changes, in terms of restoring basic honesty and integrity, which have occurred in our national government for at least the past generation.
YOUR NEW MORAL LEADERSHIP AT THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT
In your first address to Justice Department employees on Tuesday, April 6th, 1993, you spoke eloquently of your determination that during your tenure as Attorney General, all policy decisions, prosecutions, and initiatives should be measured against the legal, moral, and ethical imperative: "WHAT IS THE RIGHT THING TO DO?"
"While I am the Attorney General, we will address each issue with one question: 'What's the right thing to do?'
"That can be a tough question. To decide what is right will often require debate and a open, reasoned, and informed give-and-take between us all. I am, and will be, accessible.
"If you have suggestions for improving the Department, or for better serving Americans throughout this nation that you can't get implemented, I am here. I want to meet with you. And I want to hear your suggestions.
[Page 2]
"If colleagues disagree on a course of action, I want to hear all the arguments. If you disagree with me about a position I have taken, or what I have done, tell me -- argue with me: debate it. Sometimes right and good are not that clear. At other times, it is only deliberate and respectful debate that leads us to understand what road we should take. Rather than disapproving, I will respect all the more the person who stands up to me in prepared and reasoned disagreement.
"I will want this Department to be as open as possible under the law.
"We represent the American people, and we must be accountable to the people. ..."
On the principles that the Justice Department must be administered with honesty and integrity, that NO MAN OR WOMAN IS ABOVE THE LAW, and that the government itself must never be allowed to become the chief law breaker (rather than the chief law enforcer), you stated in your April 6th address:
"As we deal with the issues of violence and crime
[such as the Waco incident and other matters which are the subjects of this letter],
we must never forget the awesome power of the federal government. And we must harness that power to make sure that innocent people are NOT charged, or even tainted, by our actions, and that the guilty are convicted -- according to principles of strict due process and fair play, and with adherence to our Constitution. ...
"Working with the best legal minds in America, we need to develop new and creative reforms that open our Courts to ALL our people, and give to every American a reason to believe that the Constitution is a living document that means something. ..."
And you concluded your April 6th remarks by stating:
" 'WHAT IS THE RIGHT THING TO DO?' Let us leave here today resolved to ask that of ourselves and others as we seek justice -- remembering that sometimes doing the right thing is very politically unpopular. Sometimes it will be painful, for it will, of necessity, hurt someone. But with strength and courage, let us face that question unafraid, and together seek justice for all."
I, along with a broad majority of thoughtful Americans applauded your April 6th address, and wholeheartedly support the new direction and the high moral tone of leadership you have brought to the Justice Department.
This new direction and high moral tone are, quite obviously, directly relevant to how you and your Department should respond to the recent tragic events in Waco, Texas, on April 19th. But obviously, before that can occur, you must first be made aware of what actually happened during that incident.
[Page 3]
The initial purpose of this letter, therefore, and of my meeting with you (whenever that meeting ultimately occurs), is for me to comply with the high legal, moral, and ethical standards you alluded to in your April 6th address, and to pass on to you the highly sensitive information I have received concerning what actually happened in Waco on April 19th -- information which I am positive has thus far been kept from you by Reagan-Bush holdovers in the Justice Department, the FBI, the BATF, and others in the government tied to the CIA and the larger so-called "intelligence" community.
MY DUTY TO REPORT THIS NEW INFORMATION TO YOU AND WHEN I ACQUIRED THE INFORMATION
The new information concerning Waco, which is set forth in specific detail throughout the remaining portions of this letter, I received primarily on the following dates:
(a) Thursday, March 11th, 1993 -- 12 days after the initial Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms ("BATF") raid on Sunday, February 28th -- when I received initial information:
(1) that "cult" leader David Koresh had an extensive CIA background;
(2) that he was known in CIA circles as a "sleeper" -- someone who had been subjected to extensive CIA "mind control" training and programming;
(3) that it was not just a mere coincidence that all these events were occurring in or near Waco, Texas -- since Waco is a major center for such CIA "mind control" experimentation and programming -- with much of this activity at the CIA's Leadership Management Institute in Waco;
(4) that similar CIA-sponsored "cults" are located across the country -- including in such places as:
(A) Salt Lake City, Utah,
(B) Provo, Utah,
(C) Logan, Utah,
(D) Boise, Idaho, and
(E) San Francisco;
(5) and that any one or all of these other "cults" can likewise "explode" onto the front pages of the press at any time the CIA deems appropriate, in order accomplish its pre-determined, hidden, right-wing political agenda.
(b) Tuesday, April 20th (the day following the Waco conflagration) -- when I received initial, sketchy information that what had happened in Waco had NOT been a mass suicide, but rather a MASS MURDER, along with a preliminary indication as to who had committed the murders;
[Page 4]
(c) Tuesday, April 27th -- when my earlier April 20th information was confirmed -- and when I was given more specific information as to who had committed the murders, who had ordered them, and who had been part of the chain of command;
Note Well: As soon as I received this information, I felt I had a duty to report it directly to you, Attorney General Reno. So, I came to the Justice Department that same afternoon to try to get an appointment with you as soon as your schedule permitted.
(d) And finally, Monday, May 3rd -- two (2) days before my originally scheduled appointment with you (on Wednesday, May 5th, at 1:30 PM) -- when I learned in far greater detail precisely how the murders had been carried out, who had committed them, and why.
I also learned that another one of these CIA "cults" -- perhaps one of those identified on page 4 above, or perhaps another I have not yet heard of -- is already scheduled to "explode" onto the front pages of the press very soon -- perhaps even as early as June of this year.
Note Well: This May 3rd information (set forth in detail beginning on page 12 below) was given to me specifically so that I could pass it on to you in our Wednesday, May 5th meeting.
But because both my phone and apartment are illegally "bugged" -- and have been for at least the past year and a half -- and because those behind this illegal surveillance are determined to see that this explosive new information NEVER reaches you, I strongly suspect that you were then approached by someone --
[by precisely whom, I have no idea, but you should find out who, in order to break out of the hermetically sealed "cocoon" your handlers have secretly placed you in] --
in order to persuade you that under NO circumstances should you meet with me or take anything I have to say seriously.
I strongly suspect that the reasons given to you by your handlers in this regard were totally fabricated and pretextual. I also strongly suspect that these "gatekeepers" are part of a much larger and more sinister conspiracy to prevent you, at all costs, from ever learning the truth -- so that you will NEVER have the opportunity to pose the legal, moral, and ethical imperative: "What is the right thing to do in light of what REALLY happened at Waco on April 19th?" -- much less to actually be able to act on that imperative.
At any rate, on the basis of this and other information I have received, I feel that I have a legal, moral, and ethical duty to report to you, Attorney General Reno, all that I have learned about what really happened in Waco, on Monday, April 19th --
even though by doing so I am putting my own life, and the lives of a number of participants and other key witnesses who are now willing to come forward to testify, in serious jeopardy --
[Page 5]
under the relevant federal statutes, Disciplinary Rules, A.B.A. Canons of Ethics, and other "Whistle Blower" imperatives set forth below. See for example:
(1) 18 USC Section 4 -- Misprision of a felony:
"Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony
cognizable by a Court of the United States --
[here the felonies of murder, arson, wire fraud, and obstruction
of justice, as predicate crimes, and operating certain branches or agencies
of the federal government as a criminal racketeering enterprise, as the
substantive offense -- all in violation of 18 USC Section 1962(c) of the
RICO Statute -- see pages 12 and following below],
conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States --
[here yourself, Ms. Reno, in your capacity as the Attorney General of the United States],
shall be fined not more than $500, or imprisoned not more than three (3) years, or both."
Comment: As stated above, my initial attempts to set up an appointment with you were made on Tuesday, April 27th, within hours of my having received crucial elements of this new information.
(2) Disciplinary Rule 7-109(a) of the Illinois Code of Professional Responsibility, adopted August 1, 1981 [which Code and Disciplinary Rules closely parallel the relevant provisions of most other states and Bar Associations across the country]:
"A lawyer shall NOT suppress any evidence that he or his client has a legal obligation to reveal or produce."
(3) Ethical Consideration 7-27:
"Because it interferes with the proper administration of justice, a lawyer should NOT suppress evidence that he ... has a legal obligation to reveal or produce."
(4) Disciplinary Rule 1-103:
(a) "A lawyer possessing unprivileged knowledge of a violation of Rule 1-102(a)(3)
[relating to illegal conduct involving moral turpitude by attorneys, judges, or other public officials]
or Rule 1-102(a)(4)
[relating to conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation by these same people]
[Page 6]
shall report such knowledge to a tribunal or other authority empowered to investigate or act upon such knowledge."
(b) "A lawyer possessing unprivileged knowledge or evidence concerning another lawyer or judge [or other public official] shall reveal fully such knowledge or evidence [either voluntarily or] upon proper request of a tribunal or other authority empowered to investigate or act upon the conduct of lawyers, judges [and other public officials]."
(5) Disciplinary Rule 7-102(b)(2):
"A lawyer who receives information clearly establishing that a person other than his client has perpetrated a fraud upon a tribunal
Note Well: [in this case, the fraud has been committed on you, Ms. Reno, as the Attorney General of the United States, as well as on the House Judiciary Committee in your recent Hearings before them, and, indeed, on the American people as a whole],
shall promptly reveal the fraud to the tribunal."
(6) The ABA Annotated Code of Professional Responsibility (The American Bar Foundation, Chicago) (1979 Edition), states, at pages 326 and 327:
"Disciplinary Rule 7-102(b)(2) obligates a lawyer to disclose any fraud that has been perpetrated upon a tribunal by a person other than his or her client, when the lawyer receives information clearly establishing the fraud. ... Courts have upheld the proprietary of imposing on a lawyer, as an officer of the Court, an affirmative duty to promptly notify the Court
[or other tribunal -- here again, yourself, Ms. Reno, as the Attorney General of the United States]
of the wrongdoing, in order to preserve the integrity of the judicial process" [and the entire administration of justice].
(7) Ethical Consideration 1-4:
"The integrity of the [legal] profession can be maintained only if conduct of lawyers, [judges, and other public officials] in violation of the Disciplinary Rules is brought to the attention of the proper authorities.
"A lawyer should reveal voluntarily to those officials all unprivileged knowledge of conduct of lawyers, [judges, and other public officials] which he believes clearly to be in violation of the Disciplinary Rules."
(8) Ethical Consideration 8-5:
"Fraudulent, deceptive, or otherwise illegal conduct by a participant in a proceeding before a tribunal ... is inconsistent with the fair administration of justice, and should NEVER be participated in, or condoned, by lawyers. ...
[Page 7]
"A lawyer should reveal to appropriate authorities any knowledge he may have of such improper conduct."
(9) E. Wayne Thode, "The Duty of Lawyers and Judges to Report Other Lawyers' Breaches of the Standards of the Legal Profession," Utah Law Review 95, 100 (1976):
"Standards of fraternal camaraderie are NOT appropriate for a self-policing profession that is concerned with the administration of justice."
(10) Justin A. Stanley, "Comments on Professionalism," Illinois Bar Journal (October 1986), at pages 74, 19 and 20:
"One of the steps which lawyers and Judges must take is the reporting of observed improper conduct of other lawyers, Judges [and other public officials]. Without that, the enforcement structures which are in place cannot be effective. Such reporting ... should be regarded as part of the Code [i.e., as mandatory]. ...
"In appropriate cases, lawyers and judges should be disciplined if they fail to report [such] misconduct. ...
"Lawyers and judges should report to the appropriate Disciplinary Committee or Prosecuting Attorney any serious misconduct on the part of other lawyers, judges [or other public officials] that they believe would support a complaint for discipline or criminal charges."
(11) "In the Spirit of Public Service: A Blueprint for the Rekindling of Lawyer Professionalism," Report by the American Bar Association Commission on Professionalism (1986) at pages 13, 29 - 30, and 37 - 38:
"The Bar should place increasing emphasis on the role of lawyers as officers of the Court, or more broadly, as officers of the system of justice. lawyers ... have a duty to make the system of justice work properly. ...
"In the end, it is the responsibility of individual lawyers to ensure that abuses do not occur. ... What we must never forget is that we all serve as 'officers of the court.' ...
"Unless reports are made of misconduct and unethical violations, it will remain difficult to take any needed disciplinary or criminal action against the offending persons. moreover, we are informed that few lawyers, if any, are ever disciplined for even knowingly failing to report the misconduct of a fellow lawyer [judge, or other public official].
"In view of the clear obligation to report, we urge that proceedings be brought in appropriate cases against lawyers who fail to do so. We believe that ... a few such proceedings will result in an improved attitude by lawyers with respect to reporting."
[Page 8]
(12) Joseph R. Tybor and Maurice Possley, "Lawyers Unwilling to Blow Whistle on Corrupt Peers, Judges," The Chicago Tribune, Sunday, January 6th, 1985, Section 5, page 1:
"Can the legal profession be trusted to police itself? ... Many attorneys say that it is up to lawyers themselves to raise the ethical standards of the profession [by] ... reporting misconduct of their peers.
" 'If anybody deserves a bad rap, it's the lawyers,' said Jerold S. Solovy, chairman of a special court study commission ... "The lawyers are the ones who are responsible for guarding the system, and they are the ones who know what's wrong with the system. ...
"Robert Cummins, inquiry board chairman, ... said the profession risks losing its powers of self-regulation unless it begins living up to its code of ethics. 'If lawyers and judges don't come to grips with their professional responsibility to report misconduct, then we no longer deserve to be self-regulated,' Cummins said at a recent conference on judicial ethics sponsored by the Illinois Judges Association.
" 'The public ... can't have confidence in a self-regulated system if self-regulation doesn't work.' "
(13) Ronald D. Rotunda, Editor, "Professionals, Pragmatists, or Predators?" 75 Illinois Bar Journal 540 (June, 1987):
"It is a very difficult thing to ask a lawyer to .. turn in a fellow lawyer, or ... a judge [or other public official]; and it takes a lot of courage for a lawyer to do that ..."
(14) Myron Peretz Glazer & Penina Migdal Glazer, "Whistleblowing -- The Costs are High, the Results Uncertain. So Why do some People Risk All to Reveal Fraud and Waste in their organizations?" Psychology Today (August, 1986) at pages 37 to 43:
"If you have worked for long in any area of business or government, you, too, have probably come across some blatant examples of waste, fraud, or corruption. Maybe they were bad enough that you tried to do something about them. Most of us don't. But what about the few who do, the ethical resisters who blow the whistle on mismanagement and dishonesty? What makes them act, when the rest of us look the other way?
"In recent years, we have corresponded at length with 55 whistle-blowers, and many of their spouses. Kathy Laubach, the wife of one resister, expresses clearly what seems to be their major motivation -- a strong belief in individual responsibility:
'A corrupt system can happen only if the individuals who make up that system are corrupt. You are either going to be part of the corruption, or part of the forces working against it. There is no third choice. Someone, someday, has to take a stand. If you don't, maybe no one will. And that is wrong!' ...
[Page 9]
"The strong belief in individual responsibility that drives ethical resisters is often supported by feelings of professional ethics, religious values, or allegiance to the community."
Irving Levin, who worked in the Brooklyn office of Special Services for Children, and who was concerned about the serious child abuse, and even death, of many children which was NOT being investigated, stated:
'I knew that if I didn't do something, nobody would.'
Mary McAnaw stated:
'I know it may sound hackneyed today, but I believe it: The only thing necessary for evil to prevail is for good men to do nothing. ... I felt that if I didn't do anything, who would?'
Bert Berube, who worked for the General Services Administration as an Engineer, and who apparently blew the whistle on toxic waste dumps, stated that although he knew speaking out might harm his family, he believed that he alone had to make the decision:
'Your conscience is something you deal with yourself. It is NOT a committee decision. It is whether you believe it is right or wrong -- a question of religious faith. I am the one who is going to be held accountable by God for what I do in my life. My wife is not, nor are my children.'
General characteristics of Whistleblowers found by the researchers:
"Virtually all of the ethical resisters we studied had long histories of successful employment. They were NOT alienated or politically active members of movements advocating major changes in society. On the contrary, they began as firm believers in their organizations, convinced that if they took a grievance to superiors, there would be an appropriate response. This naivete led them into a series of damaging traps. They found that their earlier service and dedication provided them with little protection against charges of undermining organizational morale and effectiveness.
"Punishment took many forms -- transfer, demotion, firing, black-balling, personal harassment, ... intimidation
[and, in the case of Karen Silkwood, who tried to blow the whistle on illegal smuggling of nuclear materials out of a power plant to the Israeli government, the ultimate punishment -- death].
"The first step was usually to undermine the effectiveness and reputation of the whistleblowers by isolating them or assigning them to lesser duties, or none at all. Under these conditions, they would no longer see sensitive documents, or take part in conversations with colleagues that might influence policy or reveal new damaging information. ...
[Page 10]
"The 55 resisters we dealt with had mixed results in achieving these goals [of getting an outside authority to investigate their charges, and of putting their lives back together again after the devastating punishment they suffered for their whistleblowing activities].
"Recreating careers required flexibility about the kind of work, its geographical location, and often, a willingness to accept less money. For most ethical resisters, time was a crucial factor. There were many devastating months, or even years, of dislocation, unemployment, and temporary jobs. most of the resisters have restored at least a semblance of their former financial and emotional lives. A few have built satisfying and rewarding careers as a direct result of their protests. Many others have had to accept lower income and less prestige."
"WHAT IS THE RIGHT THING TO DO?"
I am fully aware, Attorney General Reno, that blowing the whistle
on the serious government-wide corruption at issue here -- even though
it is clearly the right thing to do -- is by no means an easy thing to
do, or something which should be done without a great deal of thought and
prayerful consideration. As the Psychology Today article points out, there
is often a very high price -- sometimes total devastation, or even death
-- to be paid for blowing the whistle on evil, or being "an ethical resister."
But, as you can tell from my resume (enclosed in this binder), I come from a strong moral background, have a deep and abiding personal faith, and have been a "whistle blower" concerning serious attorney, judicial, and governmental corruption on a number of occasions in the past. And I have, indeed, paid an enormous personal price for speaking the truth when those in positions of authority did not want to hear it.
But the action I am undertaking here -- blowing the whistle on the truth of what really happened in Waco on April 19th, putting that ugly truth into its broader context, and presenting to you a detailed, comprehensive plan as to how that underlying system-wide corruption can finally be exposed and rooted out -- this is something far more serious than I have ever done in the past. For in presenting all this to you, I am, quite literally, laying my life on the line.
But, in spite of the serious dangers involved, I have nevertheless decided to come forward and to present these matters to you because, as the courageous men and women quoted in the Psychology Today article said:
"You are either going to be part of the corruption, or part of the forces working against it. There is no third choice. Someone, someday, has to take a stand. If you don't, maybe no one will. And that is wrong! ...
"'I know that if I don't do something, nobody would. ...
"The only thing necessary for evil to prevail is for good men to do nothing. ... I feel that if I don't do something, who will?"
"Your conscience is something you deal with yourself. It is NOT a committee decision. It is whether you believe it is right or wrong -- a question of religious faith. I am the one who is going to be held accountable by God for what I do in my life."
[Page 11]
A BRIEF SYNOPSIS OF MY NEW INFORMATION ON WACO AND ITS SIGNIFICANCE
The gist of the new information concerning the events which occurred on Monday, April 19th, 1993, at David Koresh's Branch Davidian compound outside of Waco, Texas, which I have been given, and which I feel I have a duty to pass on to you, Attorney General Reno, is as follows:
#1) That what occurred there was NOT a mass suicide, but rather a mass murder.
#2) That the gunshots which killed David Koresh and other members of his group
[according to an article on page A-18 of The New York Times on Wednesday, May 5th, 1993, two-thirds of the bodies autopsied thus far -- more than 2 dozen then, and still counting -- have bullet wounds in them of some kind which the medical examiners say were inflicted after the date of the initial BATF raid on February 28th]
were NOT fired by Branch Davidian cult members -- either as murder, self defense, or suicide -- but rather by outsiders.
#3) That the multiple fires which ultimately engulfed and consumed the entire compound and all those in it were NOT set by either David Koresh or other members of his group, nor did they begin by accident (such as a when a tank accidentally knocked over a kerosene lantern, etc), but rather were set deliberately by these same outsiders.
VIOLATIONS OF THE RICO STATUTE
#4) Predicate Felonies under the RICO Statute:
(a) That the killing of David Koresh and the other members of his group who died by gun fire constitutes:
(1) multiple counts of murder in violation of the relevant provisions of the Texas criminal code; and
(2) multiple predicate c rimes of murder under state law in violation of 18 USC Section 1961(1)(A) of the RICO statute.
(b) That the subsequent multiple fires which ultimately consumed the bodies of David Koresh and the other cult members who had earlier been killed by gunfire, as well as all of the remaining men, women, and children who were still alive in the compound at the time, as well s the entire compound itself, constitute:
[Page 12]
(1) multiple counts of arson in violation of the relevant provisions of the Texas criminal code;
(2) multiple counts of arson in violation of 18 USC Section 844(i);
(3) multiple additional counts of murder in violation of the relevant provisions of the Texas criminal code;
(4) multiple additional predicate crimes of murder and arson under state law in violation of 18 USC Section 1961(1)(A), and arson under 18 USC Section 844(i) in violation of 18 USC Section 1961(1)(B) the RICO statute;
(5) the predicate crime of obstruction of justice under 18 USC Section 1503 in violation of 18 USC Section 1961(1)(B) of the RICO statute -- since one of the obvious purposes of the fire was to destroy all possible forensic evidence relating to the original murders by gun fire;
[For a subsequent, but nevertheless relevant and timely example of this same kind of arson committed for the purpose of covering up earlier murders, see the article on page A-3 of The Washington Post, on Tuesday, May 4th, 1993, reported by the Reuter's News Service out of New York City, which begins:
"6 Found Slain Amid Flames in Harlem Flat -- 18-month-old Child, Others were Slashed:
"Six people, including three children, were hacked to death in a Harlem apartment today by an unknown assailant, and two (2) fires were set in an attempt to cover up the crime, police said."
(6) and destruction of property to prevent seizure in violation of 18 USC Section 2232 -- again, since one of the obvious purposes of the fire was to destroy all possible forensic evidence.
(c) That the lies which Justice Department, FBI, CIA, BATF, and other government agents who were on the scene in Waco at the time, as well as other government officials in Washington, D.C., and elsewhere around the country, who knew the truth concerning what actually happened at the Branch Davidian compound on April 19th, but who nevertheless knowingly and deliberately concealed that truth from you, and grossly misrepresented the "facts" to you, Attorney General Reno --
which then totally misled you, and which, in turn, caused you (unknowingly) to mislead the American public when you spoke to the nation on all four (4) television networks on the evening of April 19th, constitute:
(1) multiple counts of wire fraud (and/or conspiracy to do so), in violation of 18 USC Section 1343;
[Page 13]
(2) obstruction of justice (and/or conspiracy to do so) in violation of 18 USC Section 1503;
(3) obstruction of a federal criminal investigation (and/or conspiracy to do so), in violation of 18 USC Section 1510;
(4) obstruction of a state or local criminal investigation (and/or conspiracy to do so), in violation of 18 USC Section 1511; and
(5) multiple predicate crimes of wire fraud, obstruction of justice, obstruction of a federal criminal investigation, and obstruction of a state or local criminal investigation in violation of 18 USC Section 1961(1)(B) of the RICO statute.
(d) That the lies which these same government agents, who knew the truth concerning what actually happened in Waco, but who nevertheless knowingly and deliberately concealed that truth from you, and grossly misrepresented the "facts" to you, Attorney General Reno --
which then totally misled you, and in turn, caused you (unknowingly) to misled the members of the House Judiciary Committee in your recent televised testimony before that Committee, constitute:
(1) multiple counts of false statements (and/or conspiracy to do so), in violation of 18 USC Section 1001;
(2) multiple counts of perjury (and/or conspiracy to do so), in violation of 18 USC Section 1621;
(3) multiple counts of wire fraud (and/or conspiracy to do so), in violation of 18 USC Section 1343;
(4) obstruction of justice (and/or conspiracy to do so) in violation of 18 USC Section 1503;
(5) obstruction of proceedings before a Congressional Committee (and/or conspiracy to do so) in violation of 18 USC Section 1505;
(6) obstruction of a federal criminal investigation (and/or conspiracy to do so) in violation of 18 USC Section 1510; and
(7) multiple predicate crimes of wire fraud, obstruction of justice, obstruction of a federal criminal investigation, in violation of 18 USC Section 1961(1)(B) of the RICO statute.
[Page 14]
#5) The RICO "Enterprise":
(a) Under Section 1962(b):
That the "enterprise" here, for purposes of 18 USC Section 1961(4) and Section 1962(b) of the RICO statute, is the Branch Davidian compound itself and the cult which David Koresh had headed over the past several years there.
(b) Under Section 1962(c):
That the "enterprise" here, for purposes of 18 USC Section 1961(4) and Section 1962(b) of the RICO statute, is a group of individuals operating in league with each other, working in or through any one or more of the following agencies or departments of the Federal Government, and/or an association-in-fact between or among these various individuals, departments, and agencies:
(1) The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms ("BATF") of the United States Treasury Department;
(2) The Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI") of the United States Justice Department;
(3) The United States Justice Department itself;
(4) The so-called "intelligence" community of the Federal Government -- including, but not limited to, the Central Intelligence Agency ("CIA"), the Office of Naval Intelligence ("ONI"), the Defense Intelligence Agency ("DIA"), the National Security Agency ("NSA"), and others -- all operating under the command of the Director of Central Intelligence ("DCI");
(5) The Delta Force, an elite commando-type unit composed of specially trained members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marines, operating under the Defense Department and the command of the Joint Chief of Staff and the DCI;
(6) and/or other federal departments, agencies, or persons therein.
#6) Nexus to interstate Commerce:
(a) Under Section 1962(b):
That, for purposes of Section 1962(b) of the RICO statute, the Branch Davidian compound itself had numerous and indisputable nexes to interstate or foreign commerce -- not the least of which was that members of the compound had come from, and still had relatives in, many of the various states of this nation, as well as in many foreign countries, including England and Australia.
[Page 15]
(b) Under Section 1962(c):
That, for purposes of Section 1962(c) of the RICO statute, each of the federal departments or agencies enumerated in Item #5(b) above likewise has an obvious, indeed indisputable, nexus to interstate or foreign commerce since each of these departments and agencies operates in all fifty (50) states in the Union;
#7) Substantive CRIMINAL RICO violations:
That the substantive CRIMINAL RICO violations here consist of:
(a) Section 1962(b):
Acquiring control of )indeed, bringing about the total destruction and annihilation of) the "enterprise" -- here, the Branch Davidian compound and cult itself -- through a pattern of racketeering activity (i.e., the predicate federal felonies of murder, arson, wire fraud, obstruction of justice, and obstruction of a federal and state criminal investigation, discussed above) in violation of 18 USC section 1962(b) of the RICO statute;
(b) Section 1962(c):
Conducting the affairs of the "enterprise" -- here, one or more of the federal departments and agencies enumerated in Item #5(b) above (or an association-in-fact between or among them and the individuals involved) as a criminal racketeering enterprise, through a pattern of racketeering activity (the predicate federal felonies of murder, arson, wire fraud, obstruction of justice, and obstruction of a federal and state criminal investigation, discussed above) in violation of 18 USC Section 1962(c) of the RICO statute; and
(c) Section 1962(d) -- RICO CONSPIRACY:
Conspiring among themselves to violate Section 1962(b) and Section
1962(c) of the RICO statute.
---------------
In other words, the information I am passing on to you, Attorney
General Reno, set forth in specific detail below, is of the utmost seriousness
and urgency, because it leads to the inevitable and inescapable conclusion
that in the events which resulted in the total destruction and annihilation
of David Koresh and his Branch Davidian compound, and the other 85 men,
women, and children therein, one or more of the Federal departments or
agencies set forth above (and persons acting in or through them) were carrying
out the police powers of our government in a manner reminiscent of mobsters
and gangsters -- in utter violation of the relevant federal and state criminal
codes as well as in utter violation of the RICO statute itself.
And it was these grossly criminal acts on the part of governmental officials and agents -- and NOT any supposed "mass suicide" -- which resulted in the fiery, hellish deaths of these 86 persons, while the whole world watched the Branch Davidian compound go up in flames on Monday, April 19th, 1993.
[Page 16]
Therefore, let me now set forth the specific factual information I have been given concerning this massive conflagration -- including, but not limited to:
(a) The hidden factual background concerning David Koresh -- Who was he? Why did the government show such an extraordinary interest in his activities? And what was the reason behind the initial February 28th raid on his compound in which four (4) BATF agents and six (6) cult members were killed?
(b) What actually occurred in the compound on April 19th?
(c) Who carried out the murders? Who set the fires? And why?
(d) Who gave the orders directing that these murders and fires should be carried out, and why? And what was the chain of command?
(e) How does this Waco tragedy fit into the bigger picture? For example, how does it relate to earlier incident we have all heard about like:
(1) the supposed "mass suicide" of 914 men, women, and children in Jonestown, Guyana, in the mid-1970's, and
(2) the burning down of an entire city block and neighborhood where the Black "MOVE" community was located, in Philadelphia in the mid-1980's?
(f) And are there similar "cults" and other heavily-fortified compounds in this country which are likely to "explode" onto the front page in the near future? And if so, what elements do all of these "cults" or compounds have in common?
SPECIFIC INFORMATION AS TO WHAT HAPPENED IN WACO
Let me begin by admitting that I was NOT in Waco, Texas, either on February 28th, 1993, or on April 19th, 1993 (or at any other time, for that matter), and that NONE of the information I am about to pass on to you is known to me personally, from my own first-hand knowledge or experience.
However, let me hasten to add that at the conclusion of this presentation, I have set forth in specific detail a procedure under which some 16 or so men, each with extensive "intelligence" and covert ("black") operations backgrounds, over the past 30 years or so, many of whom do have direct, first-hand knowledge of what occurred in Waco on April 19th, will come forward --
if given full immunity and federal protection for themselves and their families --
and will testify, under oath, at length and in specific detail, concerning not only all of these events surrounding this tragedy near Waco, but also concerning numerous other highly illegal and criminal "black" operations -- including, but not limited to, each of those enumerated on pages 47 to 51 below.
[Page 17]
In other words, while I cannot personally testify as to the truthfulness or accuracy of the information set forth below, each of the 16 or so covert operatives who seek to come forward under the terms and conditions set forth below, not only can, but will, do so -- at length, and in great detail. And the combined weight of their testimony, and of all the factual and corroborating evidence they will help you unearth, will show that the specific facts and allegations set forth below concerning what happened near Waco on April 19th, are true, accurate, and provable, beyond a reasonable doubt, in a Court of law.
With these caveats, let me now set forth the information I have been given concerning the facts and circumstances surrounding the recent tragic events at the Branch Davidian compound near Waco, Texas.
BACKGROUND LEADING UP TO THE FEBRUARY 28TH BATF RAID
#1) To begin with, Vernon Wayne Howell, also known as David Koresh, had connections to the Central Intelligence Agency ("CIA").
#2) Indeed, he and six (6) of the men in his inner circle were known among CIA covert operatives as "sleepers" -- persons whom the Agency had performed mind control experiments on, and who had been preprogrammed to carry out specific pieces of CIA "dirty business" at some point in the future, once a specific cue or signal was given to them by their contact persons or "handlers" within the Agency.
#3) Third, David Koresh was very much like the Reverend Jim Jones, in that he, too, was "a gangster who used a Bible instead of a gun."
(a) See John Judge's Lecture to Sarah McClendon's Group, given at the Kennedy-Warren Apartment Building, on Friday, April 23rd, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as John Judge lecture #2), at page 24. See also pages 11, 13, 22 to 30, and 37 to 40.
(b) See also John Judge's Lecture to Sarah McClendon's Group, given at the National Press Club, on Friday, January 22nd, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as John Judge Lecture #1), at pages 30 and 70 to 77 for an extended discussion of what actually caused the deaths of the 914 men, women, and children in Jonestown, Guyana.
Note Well: Jonestown was NOT a mass suicide, any more than Waco was. Instead, Jonestown, like Waco, was a mass murder -- in order to guarantee that there would be NO survivors to tell about the CIA's extensive mind control experiments which had been performed on those 914 mostly-black victims in Guyana.
#4) Fourth, David Koresh was also very much like Charlie Manson, in that he, Jones, and Manson all demanded and received total domination over, and total submission from, all of the men, women, and children in his group.
#5) And like the Reverend Jim Jones and Charlie Manson, David Koresh likewise had received much of his mind control training at the hands of the CIA, and was a product of their system.
[Page 18]
#6) In other words, David Koresh may have been what most people would consider a thoroughly disgusting, and mentally disturbed, megalomaniac. But he was the CIA's megalomaniac -- or at least someone they were all too happy to use for their devious right-wing purposes if and when the opportunity ever presented itself.
#7) Indeed, David Koresh and these six (6) other men in his inner circle had apparently been pre-programmed by the CIA to become, on cue, "Manchurian-Candidate-type" robot assassins.
NOTE: This is one of the most crucially important pieces of information concerning this entire scenario. Koresh and his six (6) fellow "sleepers" were apparently pre-programmed by the CIA to become "wind up, use once, then throw away" robot-type assassins -- much like:
(a) Sirhan B. Sirhan, the man used as the CIA "patsy" in the assassination of Senator Robert Kennedy on June 5th, 1968:
For a further discussion of Sirhan Sirhan's role [and what really happened] in the assassination of Robert Kennedy, see:
(1) pages 78 and 79 of John Judge's Lecture #1, and
(2) pages 22 and 26 of John Judge's Lecture #2; and
(b) David Hinckley, the man used as the CIA "patsy" in the attempted assassination of President Ronald Reagan on March 31, 1981.
For a further discussion of David Hinckley's role [and what really happened] in the attempted assassination of President Reagan see:
(1) page 38 of John Judge's Lecture #1,
(2) pages 42, 48 to 59, and 69 to 79 of John Judge's Lecture #2, and
(3) pages 15 to 17 of my May 20th, 1992 Letter to Congressman Lee Hamilton below.
#8) The CIA has apparently been able to produce "Manchurian-Candidate-type" robot assassins ever since the late 1940's, using methods reminiscent of the "brain washing" we have all heard about in Soviet (and American) on prisoner of war camps and prisons -- as well as far more sophisticated and sinister techniques which have been developed and perfected over the intervening years.
#9) One of the most important features of this kind of mind control programming or "brain washing" is the fact that critical segments of the subject's memory -- including most or all of the programming experience itself -- are erased (or at least suppressed and deeply buried), with new false "memories" implanted into the subject's unconscious mind in their place. Indeed, all of this mind, behavior, and memory alteration is done at the subconscious or unconscious level.
[Page 19]
Indeed, once the CIA's programming has been completed, memory blocks are installed into the subject's subconscious mind to make it next-to-impossible for him ever to recover these critical mind- and behavior-altering experiences from his internal memory bank.
Therefore, since he is unable to remember what was done to him -- or when, where, how, or under what circumstances it happened -- he is also virtually helpless to confront and overcome what his CIA programmers have done to him. He is thus at their "mercy" from then on -- though, of course, they have NO mercy.
#10) Then, at some time in the future, upon being given a specific secret signal -- known in advance only to his CIA "handlers" and his subconscious mind, and which to any untrained person (such as a husband, wife, coworker, etc.) would be overlooked as being totally innocuous -- he will automatically revert back to carrying out whatever behaviour he has been pre-programmed to perform on cue -- nearly always some violent or criminal act against a person or group the CIA has targeted for destruction. At least, that's how such mind control programming is supposed to work.
#11) It is also important to note that such mind control programming generally includes one or more pre-programmed "self-destruct" responses, so that the subject can be ordered by his handlers to commit "suicide" -- again, as a kind of mindless, trance-like, robotic response which he would not even be consciously aware he was being ordered to do, or that he was actually carrying out, until it was too late to save him -- if and when his handlers ever deem it necessary for him NOT to be available for questioning by persons who might be able to uncover the truth about his secret programming, and/or what tasks he had been pre-programmed to perform in his trance-like robotic state.
These "self-destruct" responses would typically be triggered by the subject's handlers once he had successfully performed his pre-assigned mission, or once that mission had been called off or altered -- or under any other scenario under which he would no longer be of any value to the Agency -- as a way of protecting his handlers, and the Agency itself, from any exposure, liability, or accountability -- under what is called "plausible deniability."
David Koresh's psychological profile, however, showed him NOT to be a person ever likely to commit suicide. See page 40 below.
#12) John Judge has informed me of some of the government's early work in mind control and MK ULTRA -- such as the work done by a Dr. Kligman at the University of Pennsylvania, and at the Edgewood Arsenal.
#13) The Programming of Candy Jones:
John Judge has also informed me of one documented example of the "self-destruct" aspect of such mind control programming -- the case of a woman named Candy Jones, who was a former model and the wife of "Long John" Knebel, a well-known talk show host in the 1950's.
[Page 20]
Unbeknownst to Knebel, and apparently before he met and married her, Candy has been through a mind control program similar to the ones we have been discussing here, so that on receiving a secret command from her handlers, she would revert into a second personality, and, in this trance-like robotic state, would carry out a criminal, aggressive act (like assassination) against a pre-selected target -- or, on receiving a second command, would turn that violence in upon herself and commit "suicide."
After some period of time, Mr. Knebel and a team of doctors began helping Candy to uncover some of the details of her mind control programming, so that she could overcome her past and return to more "normal" patterns of interacting with others. But when her handlers learned of there efforts to excise Candy's programming from her subconscious, she received a phone call from one of them, and was given the secret command that she should commit "suicide."
When Mr. Knebel couldn't reach Candy on the phone, he suspected the worst and rushed home to find her in the bathtub bleeding to death, after she had acted to carry out this "self-destruct" command.
Fortunately, for her, for him, and for our knowledge of mind control, he was able to reach his wife in time to save her life. The details of their story are recited in:
The Control of Candy Jones, by Donald Bain, published by Playboy Press.
#14) The Strange Death of George DeMohrenschildt:
Another possible example of this "self-destruct" aspect of such mind control programming is the death of George DeMohrenschildt, who, prior to the Kennedy assassination, had reportedly been one of Lee Harvey Oswald's CIA handlers. On the day when investigators from the House Select Committee on Assassinations ("HSCA") came to question him at his home, he was found dead of a gun shot wound.
[DeMohrenschildt was just one of several key witnesses in the Kennedy Assassination investigation who was found dead the very day HSCA investigators were scheduled to interview them. Another was Regis Kennedy, an FBI agent at Dealey Plaza in Dallas, who, immediately following JFK's murder, searched out persons (other than Abraham Zapruder) who had been taking home movies of the historic event and confiscated their movies, saying that the FBI needed them for its investigation. Needless to say, none of these home movies has ever been seen or heard from since, and the FBI has steadfastly refused to release them. No doubt, Regis Kennedy's death was to silence any further questions about these missing home movies, as well as any other knowledge he may have had concerning what really happened in Dallas on November 22nd, 1963.]
DeMohrenschildt's widow, who was a friend of both Lee Harvey Oswald and Jacqueline Kennedy -- as well as wealthy Texas oilmen H. L. Hunt and Bob Kerr, and Dallas' top CIA man J. Walter Moore -- insisted that she did NOT believe her husband had committed suicide, and that those who had silenced him would soon show up to kill her, too.
[Page 21]
She was also firm in her belief that Oswald had NOT killed Kennedy, that both Oswald and her husband had been agents of the CIA, and that the CIA had killed Oswald and her husband (as well as Kennedy), in order to cover up the truth about the assassination.
I believe that Mrs. DeMohrenschildt's assessment of these subjects is probably correct. But to the extent that her husband MAY have committed "suicide" -- if that is, in fact, what happened -- it was undoubtedly one of these "suicides" carried out by someone who has been subjected to mind control in the past, and then, upon being given a secret signal by his handlers, kills himself, in a trance-like robotic state, before he realizes what he is doing, and before anyone can intervene to stop or save him.
On the strange death of George DeMohrenschildt, see:
High Treason -- The Assassination of President John F. Kennedy: What Really Happened, by Robert J. Groden & Harrison Edward Livingstone (The Conservatory Press, New York, Baltimore, & Montreal) (1989), at pages 113 and following.
#15) Six Staged Murders in Pershing Park, 2 Blocks from the White House:
Another possible series of examples of the kind of mind control experimentation we have been discussing apparently occurred in Pershing park, at 14th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, in northwest Washington, D.C., across the street from the Willard Hotel, just two (2) blocks from the White House, at the end of Reagan's 2nd term, and beginning of the Bush Administration.
(a) What happened here was the murder of six (6) Black men -- one on each of six (6) different occasions. According to information I have received, the dates of there six (6) incidents are a s follows:
(1) June 10th, 1988, at approximately 7:00 PM;
(2) July 28th, 1988, at approximately 9:45 PM;
(3) May 13th, 1989, at approximately 10:24 PM;
(4) June 16th, 1989, at approximately 9:19 PM;
(5) July 16th, 1989, at approximately 8:00 PM; and
(6) August 25th, 1989, at approximately 8:00 PM.
(b) On each occasion, a Black man known only as "Sailor Hat" (because he was wearing a white sailor hat) came out of the District of Columbia Administration Building located nearby, and walked over to Pershing Park.
(c) Upon entering Pershing Park, "Sailor Hat" huddled with the individual Black man who was about to be killed, and did the following:
[Page 22]
(1) First, he talked to the man and/or gave him some sort of verbal instructions or signal: and
(2) Second, he also gave the man a swig of liquid out of what looked like a liquor bottle. It is conjectured that this liquid was some sort of a "cocktail" -- i.e., a mixture of alcohol and drugs -- although nobody seems to know for sure what was in the bottle.
(d) After talking with "Sailor Hat," receiving his instructions, and drinking his "cocktail," the Black man who was about to be killed in each instance then immediately went berserk, and began "playing" -- in a very belligerent, violent, and predatory manner -- the game of "Black Man's Park" -- meaning:
"Pershing Park belongs to Black people, and therefore, I am going to attack and beat 'the living daylights' out of the first white person I see in or near the park."
(e) On 5 of these 6 occasions, the first (and apparently only) white person this Black man encountered was Michael Fuller, the owner and operator of Wheels Across Washington, a horse-drawn-carriage limousine service, who maintained a stop where he picked up tourists for carriage rides at the far edge of Pershing park, right across from the Willard Hotel.
(f) Michael Fuller's background is rich and varied, but apparently includes a number of years in the covert operations section of the CIA where he may have served for some period as one of the CIA's secret "hit" men.
(g) At any rate, Michael Fuller is highly skilled in martial arts and hand-to-hand combat, and therefore, when he was attacked by those five (5) Black men, he was quickly and easily able to defend himself -- and on each occasion, he ultimately killed his Black attacker, in self defense.
(h) On these first 5 occasions, no one seems to know the names of the five (5) Black men whom Fuller killed in self-defense -- or anything else about them.
(i) On the sixth occasion (August 25th, 1989), the Black man who huddled with, received instructions from, and took a swig of the "cocktail" from "Sailor Hat" was named John Wayne Tucker. Tucker was a huge man, standing about 6'2" tall and weighing about 300 pounds, who was extraordinarily strong.
(j) On this 6th occasion, before Tucker was able to reach Michael Fuller to attack him -- Fuller was again in his usual spot at the far edge of Pershing park, waiting to pick up tourists who wanted rides in his horse-drawn carriage -- Tucker came upon an innocent white bystander, a man who just happened to be walking down the sidewalk adjoining the park at that moment.
[Page 23]
Upon reaching this innocent bystander, Tucker immediately, viciously, and with NO provocation whatsoever, began beating "the living daylights" out of this white man -- including kicking him soundly in the crotch, and injuring and frightening him to such an extent that he began screaming for help and running away as fast as he could.
(k) Fuller and a white female District of Columbia Police Officer, Maria Weyraugh, who was a friend of Fuller's and a fellow horse enthusiast, and who just happened to be cruising by the park in her patrol car at that moment, both witnessed Tucker's attack on this innocent bystander, and both immediately telephoned "911" (2 separate calls from 2 different phones) to request emergency help from the D.C. Police Department.
(l) But before the D.C. Police could possibly have had time to respond to these calls -- and it is not known whether the D.C. Police ever responded to either call -- five (5) squad cars immediately arrived on the scene from the U.S. Park Police Service, containing a large number of uniformed Black Park Police officers.
(m) This response by the U.S. Park Police was highly unusual for a number of noteworthy reasons:
(1) First, the U.S. Park Police had NOT been called by either of the 2 eyewitnesses at the scene (Fuller and Weyraugh) -- or by anyone else that they were aware of;
(2) Second, the U.S. Park Police arrived at the scene so quickly that they could NOT have had time to have been called by the D.C. Police Department's "911" dispatcher. In other words, the only possible explanation is that they arrived at the scene on cue -- because of a special pre-arrangement.
(3) Third, the U.S. Park Police in the D.C. area is made up primarily of white officers. Thus, the sudden arrival on the scene of a large number of Black Park Police officers -- when NO Park Police had been called at all -- only heightened the incongruity of the situation;
Note Well: (4) Fourth, and most important, the U.S. Park Police service is sometimes used as a cover for CIA covert operations. Indeed, that appears to have been what was happening here.
(n) The response of these Black Park Police officers to Tucker, and their attempts to subdue him, were also highly unusual.
(1) First, as stated above, Tucker was a huge man, extraordinarily strong, who fought ferociously to prevent these Park Police officers from subduing him. He was throwing them off like flies, hurling them 10 feet or more into the middle of the street, and violently and unmercifully attacking any who dared to approach him.
[Page 24]
(2) Second, the U.S. Park Police (Black or White) are NOT known for their kind and tolerant ways -- especially when faced with trying to subdue a violent, super strong, suspect who is resisting arrest. Indeed, if there was ever a time when the Park Police would have been justified in using extreme force -- like the heavy-handed "batting-practice" used to subdue Rodney King in Los Angeles -- this would have been the time. And both Fuller and Weyraugh would have backed them up 100$.
(3) But in spite of Tucker's enormous strength and multiple resists and provocations, not a single one of these Black Park Police officers drew his nightstick, or indeed, used any weapon at all, in their efforts to subdue Tucker.
(4) The result was that it took these officers a good 15 to 20 minutes to subdue Tucker, and that ultimately happened only when they finally just wore him out.
(o) But then tragedy struck. One of the Park Police officers in ultimately subduing Tucker, landed, accidentally, with his arm or elbow on Tucker's larynx, partially crushing it. And although Tucker was immediately rushed to the Emergency Room, he died later that evening from this injury.
Note Well: (p) So, the end result in all six (6) of there incidents was that the Black man whom "Sailor Hat" had talked with, had given secret instructions to, and/or had given a secret "cocktail" to -- and who then immediately went berserk attacking the first white person he encountered, for NO reason, and with NO provocation whatsoever -- ended up being killed within just minutes after his encounter with "Sailor Hat."
(q) On all six occasions, "Sailor Hat" immediately returned to, and disappeared back inside, the District of Columbia Administration Building located right near Pershing Park.
(r) On five (5) of these occasions, the Black man was killed by a possible former CIA "hit" man -- in self defense. And on the sixth occasion, he was killed -- accidentally -- when a U.S. Park police officer, who, in subduing him, landed with his arm or elbow partially crushing his larynx.
Note Well: (s) But on all six (6) occasions, the Black man, who just minutes earlier had huddled with "Sailor Hat," was murdered -- NOT by the person who ultimately brought his life to an end, but by the persons who had staged all six (6) of these incidents from the very beginning.
Note Well: (t) Indeed, the most important fact concerning all six (6) of these incidents is that there was an unmarked white TV camera van parked at the far end of Pershing Park, just a short distance from where Fuller and his horse-drawn carriage were positioned. And this van, presumably manned by CIA personnel, was apparently filming all six (6) of these incidents in their entirety, from start to finish.
[Page 25]
Note Well: (u) So, what you had here appears to be a CIA covert operation, being conducted just two (2) blocks from the White House, in which some of the secret mind control techniques we have been discussing were being tested on these six (6) Black men -- with the CIA's hidden cameras rolling the entire time -- to determine if the Agency's programming techniques were sufficiently perfected to be used on "Manchurian-Candidate-type" robot assassins in foreign countries.
Note Well: (v) These six (6) incidents were reportedly part of a larger CIA covert operation, code named Project Emporium.
(w) Part of the significance of what was occurring here is that the secret signal to activate a subject who has been through mind control training can be given:
(1) through an oral command in person -- such as "Sailor Hat's" voice commands to each of these 6 Black men;
(2) through a remote control audible tone or signal, or through a seemingly innocuous voice command -- such as over the telephone, or even by radio or television;
(3) through a chemical substance -- such as the "cocktail" "Sailor Hat" gave each of his subjects to drink;
(4) or through some combination of all three.
Note Well: (x) Quite obviously, this entire scenario of there six (6) murders within the shadow of the White House ought to be investigated thoroughly in order to determine, among other things:
(1) who authorized these mind control experiments in our nation's capital, and the pre-planned executions of these 6 Black "guinea pigs" next to the White House?
(2) and what was the background of each of these six (6) men? For example, were there any unexplained "gaps" in their lives -- such as time in prison, in the military, in psychiatric hospitals, in POW camps, etc. -- when they could have been subjected to such mind control experimentation and programming?
Cover Up: (y) Both Michael Fuller and Maria Weyraugh have tried to file reports concerning each of these six (6) deaths with the D.C. Police Department, the U.S. park Police, and other relevant departments and agencies, and have done their best to demand a full and complete investigation of what was really going on here -- but all to no avail.
Note Well: (z) Indeed, both Michael Fuller and Maria Weyraugh have paid a very heavy penalty for their attempts to "blow the whistle" here -- all of which merely underscores the extent to which the so-called "intelligence" community will go in order to bury the truth, and those who seek to expose it, concerning their secret mind control operations and the murderous ends for which those operations are frequently used.
[Page 26]
(aa) The Price Fuller has had to pay:
(1) Fuller's horse-drawn-carriage limousine service was driven out of business through a combination of:
(A) utterly trumped up charges (supposed "cruelty" to his horses, when nothing could have been further from the truth) filed against him by the Washington, D. C. Humane Society, and
(B) an utterly unconstitutional D.C. City ordinance which outlawed only Fuller's horses and his horse-carriage business (on the basis of the weight of his horses), while leaving in tatc, and creating a monopoly for, his only competitor.
Note Well: (2) These "cruelty to animals" charges against him -- a misdemeanor case filed in the DC Municipal Court -- were prosecuted -- get this -- by a federal Army Intelligence JAG brought in just to handle this one case!
And then, when Fuller and Weyraugh created a stink about these utterly trumped up charges, and the fact that this Army Intelligence JAG was prosecuting them, most of the documents and evidence JAG was prosecuting them, most of the documents and evidence in the Court's files suddenly disappeared -- including all reference to the Army Intelligence JAG's having been involved in the first place -- and all charges were ultimately dismissed.
(3) But the City ordinance outlawing Fuller's carriage service (because of the size of his horses) remains in full force and effect to this day -- with the result that he has been totally put out of business.
(4) And now, most recently, Fuller has been arrested, and is still being held in a Virginia jail without bail, on apparently trumped up charges -- simply to keep hil quiet and totally out of circulation.
(bb) The Price Weyraugh has had to pay:
(1) When Weyraugh first began asking questions about these six (6) murders in Perching Park, and demanding a full investigation, she was put on "Administrative Leave."
(2) "Administrative Leave" is the procedural device normally invoked to send a police officer home with pay while serious charges against him or her are being investigated -- in preparation for a disciplinary hearing at which those charges are then to be tried and disposed of on their merits. The normal rule is that the Department can keep an officer on Administrative Leave for only 59 days without charging him with specific misconduct, and by the 60th day, if NOT charged, he must be restored to full active duty, with all charges dropped for good.
[Page 27]
(3) In Weyraugh's case, however, she was put on "Administrative Leave," but NO charges were filed against her whatsoever.
(4) Then, as if to underscore the retaliatory and vindictive nature of the "Administrative Leave" procedure being invoked here, she was immediately ordered to report to the Department's psychiatrist, who informed her that if she would simply shut up about the six (6) incidents in Pershing Park, and would agree to remain quiet from then on, she would be restored to full active duty right away. When she refused to follow this "advice," however, she was left on "Administrative Leave" for the maximum permissible 59 days, and then reluctantly restored to full active duty on the 60th day -- but with NO charges ever having been filed against her.
(5) Later on, however, when she continued to demand an investigation of the 6 incidents in Pershing park -- and particularly when she began protesting the trumped up charges against Fuller and the City's unjust campaign to totally close down his carriage business for spurious reasons, she was ordered to report to the Department's psychiatrist, and again was directed to shut up about the 6 incidents in Pershing Park and about the vindictive treatment Fuller was receiving.
(6) But when she refused to be silenced, the Department retaliated by placing her in an indefinite "Administrative Leave" limbo -- but again, with NO charges or specifications ever having been filed against her.
(7) She has remained in this "Administrative Leave" limbo -- confined to her home as a virtual prisoner from 8:00 AM to 4:00 PM every working day, though still drawing full salary, for the past year and a half (and still counting) -- in spite of the Department's own rule that they must either charge her, or restore her to full active duty, in no more than 60 days!
(8) And now, most recently, the D.C. Police Department has decided to try to terminate her employment and pension benefits on "psychological" grounds -- arguing that her "problems" with the Department over the past 5 years have nothing to do with the Department's efforts to cover up the 6 incidents in Pershing park, and the treatment of Fuller, but instead relate solely to her being an "unstable" person who is no longer fit to be a police officer.
The more I delve onto the price Fuller and Weyraugh have had to pay for their "whistle blowing" activities here, the more I become convinced that all this retaliatory and vindictive treatment is being orchestrated behind the scenes by persons in the so-called "intelligence" community, in order to cover, with the tightest blanket of secrecy possible, the CIA's criminal use of there various
[Page 28]
mind control programming techniques, discussed above, and the murderous purposes for which those techniques are often employed.
#16) Mind Control & Memory Blocks to Ease the Consciences of the CIA's PROFESSIONAL Killers:
Thus far, we have been discussing mind control and memory blocks in the context of the CIA's "Manchurian-Candidate-type robot assassins - those low-level individuals -- like Sirhan Sirhan, David Hinckley, Mark David Chapman (who assassinated the Beatles' lead singer/song writer John Lennon), and the six (6) Black men murdered in Pershing Park -- as discussed starting on Page 22 above -- persons who are programmed by the Agency to be used only once and then "thrown away" and discarded -- i.e., persons who are destined either to be killed or imprisoned for the rest of their lives, once they have performed their pre-ordained secret mission.
In other words, these low-level individuals are highly expendable -- particularly when getting rid of them will 'preserve the "plausible deniability" that the Agency had anything to' do with their training, conduct, or activities.
In the context of these low-level individuals, the mind control programming we have been discussing is used not only to condition the desired robotic response to a pre-ordained secret signal, but also to prevent the subject from remembering anything about the conditioning and programming experience, so that he is virtually helpless to counteract or overcome it -- without many years of deep hypnosis and therapy -- as in the case of Candy Jones, discussed on pages 20 and 21 above.
There is, however, a totally different category of covert operatives employed by the CIA -- the real PROFESSIONAL killers -- who are used for multiple high- level, top secret missions, over an entire life time. These top-level "black" operatives are generally men of extraordinary intelligence, education, talent, training, and experience, and it is into their hands that most of the real 'dirty work" of the Agency -- including top-level assassinations is entrusted.
For example, the Agency will use a low-level programed robot like a Sirhan Sirhan or a David Hinckley -- to be the "patsy" for a top-level assassination, or assassination attempt (like the murder and attempted murder of Senator Robert Kennedy and President Reagan, respectively). But they rarely entrust the task of actually pulling the trigger in such a high-profile case to such a low- level "cut-out."
Instead, the real work in such top-level assassinations is carried out only by the Agency's true PROFESSIONAL killers -- persons who are NOT used just once and then discarded, but who, instead, are used over and over again, year in and year out, for nearly all of the Agency's most secret and sensitive dirty work.
"Wet" Ops: Such dirty work is generally referred to, among "black" (covert) operatives within the Agency, as "wet" operations -- operations where one or more persons are to be killed, where human blood (which is wet) is to be--spilled.
[Page 29]
DEBRIEFINGS AFTER CIA "WET" OPERATIONS
The normal procedure is that after each "BLACK" or "wet" operation
all persons participating in or connected with the operation are totally
debriefed by a special debriefing team sent from Agency headquarters --
including a psychiatrist skilled in the various mind control and memory
block techniques we have been discussing.
In this debriefing, each member of the "wet" team is required recite to the debriefing team exactly what happened during the operation, in a precise, step-by-step, detailed manner. Each member's recitation is generally repeated several times -- once normally, once under hypnosis, once with a polygraph, and once under scopolamine -- and only when the debriefers are fully satisfied that they have gotten ALL the details and that there are no glaring inconsistencies between these different recitations, is the debriefing brought to a close.
Part of the reason for this debriefing process is to provide detailed records and feedback to the Agency concerning all of the top-level "black" and "wet" operations -- i.e., precisely what was done? Was the operation a "success"? Did it go off as planned? What mistakes, if any, were made? And what improvements can be made so that on succeeding operations, the task at hand can accomplished even more professionally and expeditiously?
NOTE WELL: The importance of this point cannot be overstated. For, this means that deep within the bowels of the Central Intelligence Agency -- if you only know where to look -- you can find the detailed debriefing records on all of the "black" and "wet" operations carried out by the CIA over the past 30 years or so.
You should subpoena these records immediately, Attorney General Reno. And once you get them -- If you ever get them -- you should put them under the tightest security imaginable to protect them from being tampered with or destroyed.
All these records should then be made available for the debriefing and complete testimony of the 16 or so top covert operatives who now wish to come forward to testify -- see pages 102 and following below and as their testimony is given, released to the public.
Then, at the conclusion of the debriefing, once the debriefers are confident they have gotten ALL of the factual details, each operative is put under deep hypnosis, and the psychiatrist in the team implants memory blocks into his subconscious memory:
(a) first, to make it far more difficult for him to remember what he and his other "wet" team members did during the operation i.e., to block many of the gory details as to precisely how each of the persons targeted for "elimination" was "taken out" (i.e., murdered) -- so that he will be less likely to be troubled by recurring nightmares concerning what he and his team members have just done; and
[Page 30]
(b) second, to alleviate the guilt which would otherwise be associated with these memories, and to allow him to justify in his mind, to the extent he is able to remember what happened, that what he and his fellow team members did was "praiseworthy," rather than highly criminal -- i.e., that the person or persons they murdered were a "menace" to society and deserved to die, and that he was doing his country a valuable service by eliminating these "targets" from society.
Of course, these memories of what he and his fellows have done on these various "wet" operations are never completely erased, and can, with work, be fully recovered. But at least these mental blocks make it easier for the operative to live with himself and his conscience, and help to keep these vivid and gory images from flooding into his consciousness, and becoming obsessive thoughts and recurring nightmares.
These memory blocks are also a way for the operative to justify his having acted as the targets' accuser, prosecutor, judge, jury, and executioner -- all in one fell swoop, without the target's having been given the benefit of ANY due process whatsoever -- i.e., NO notice, NO hearing, NO right to confront and cross-examine his accusers, NO right to put on a defense, NO right to testify personally or call witnesses in his behalf, and NO right to be tried before an honest judge and a jury of his peers, according to the laws and the Constitution of the United States.
These memory blocks thus help the operative to suppress all these troubling thoughts which might otherwise disturb his waking hours or his restful sleep -- thoughts which might otherwise force him to re-examine his calling as one of the CIA's top professional killers, and to consider seriously whether he ought to pursue some other line of work.
COMMENTS ON "WET" OPERATIONS
There may be some argument in favor of such "wet" operations to "take out" the agents of foreign governments who were the sworn enemies of this nation during the "Cold War" era, or even today, in the instance of state-sponsored foreign or domestic terrorism.
But when such "wet" operations are used instead to "take out" citizens of this country who do NOT pose a legitimate threat to the society at large --
like David Koresh and the other 85 men, women, and children at the Branch Davidian compound --
and whose only real threat is that IF they were given a legitimate trial before an honest judge and jury, they might expose some of the CIA's dirty business concerning its top secret mind control operations and the murderous purposes for which they are used --
-- i.e., where these "wet" operations are used merely for the purpose of covering up and burying the truth, along with the innocent victims, in order to protect the guilty --
[Page 31]
-- as clearly was the case both in Waco and in Jonestown -- not to mention the assassinations of President John F. Kennedy, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., Senator Robert F. Kennedy, and countless other persons whom the CIA has deemed a threat to its existence --
then such "wet" operations have clearly gone way out of bounds, and absolutely must be exposed, so that those responsible can be held accountable, and so that such operations can be prevented from happening ever again in the future.
But I am getting way ahead of myself here. Let's return to David Koresh and his 6 fellow "sleepers" in Waco, Texas.
#17) Returning to David Koresh and his 6 Fellow "Sleepers" in Waco:
The point to be made here is that David Koresh and his 6 fellow "sleepers" were low-level Manchurian-Candidate-type programmed robot assassins -- who were scheduled to be used at some point in the future, but who had NOT yet been used for their pre-ordained secret missions --
Note Well: whereas the "wet" team that went in to "take them out" were some of the CIA's top professional killers.
The term "sleeper" in this context connotes:
(a) that the mind control programming which had been done on Koresh and his inner circle had probably been done a number of years earlier;
(b) that the secret instructions implanted deep into their subconscious memories had lain dormant over the intervening years;
(c) that the CIA now had to arouse Koresh and the other 6 from their "sleep" -- i.e., to reactivate the secret conditioned responses implanted into their subconscious memories -- in order to get them to perform their pre-ordained secret missions on cue, whenever the CIA deemed it appropriate; and
(d) that the CIA could also activate the secret "self-destruct" signal, discussed on pages 20 to 22 above, to cause the robotic "suicides" of Koresh and his inner circle, once they had been performed their secret mission,, or at any other time the CIA decided they were no longer of any use to the Agency.
At least that's how all this mind control programing was supposed; to work in theory.
#18) Koresh's Enormous Stockpile of Weapons:
It is also important to understand that the enormous cache of' automatic weapons, military equipment, ordinance, and ammunition which Koresh and his followers had acquired, had customized for their purposes, and had stockpiled in the Branch Davidian compound was all accumulated with the apparent knowledge and consent of the CIA over a period of several years.
[Page 32]
The point to be made here is that David Koresh had acquired this considerable arsenal for a specific purpose -- which was NOT just to be able to defend himself and his followers against the government -- should it ever decide to attack.
Rather, the primary purpose of this enormous arsenal was to allow Koresh and his 6 fellow "sleepers" to carry out whatever secret assignments they were to be given by their CIA "handlers", if and when those handlers felt the time was right to activate the CIA's prior secret mind control programming of these 7 robotic assassins.
#19) One Reason why Koresh was so Skilled in Controlling his Followers:
Therefore, one of the reasons why Koresh was so successful in controlling and subjugating the minds and wills of his followers was that he and these 6 men in his inner circle had been through such intensive and total mind control programming themselves.
But once the CIA had trained these pre-programmed robot assassins, it felt it could NOT just wind them up, and let them go. It had to keep a careful watch over them -- and, if push came to shove, to "take them out" (i.e., to kill them), if the CIA ever felt that Koresh and his 6 fellow "sleepers" could no longer be counted on to carry out their pre-assigned mission at some date in the future --
or, as ultimately occurred, if there was any danger that they might someday testify in a Court of law, or otherwise be able expose to the public the real truth about the CIA's mind control operations.
#20) The Reasons behind the Original February 28th BATF Raid:
By the way, I have no idea what the secret mission of Koresh and
his follow "sleepers" was to be
-- although I am confident that you will learn what it would have
been when the 16 covert operatives discussed below finally come forward
to testify.
But apparently, one of the factors which strongly influenced the CIA to initiate the original BATF raid on February 28th, in the first place, was that Koresh and his 6 fellow "sleepers" were said to be resisting the attempts by their handlers to prepare them for that secret mission.
Therefore, one of the Principal reasons for the initial February 28th raid was to chasten Koresh and his fellow "sleepers" -- to frighten them , and to whip them into shape. This is apparently why the BATF did NOT try to kidnap Koresh while he was jogging along the county roads near the compound, and also why it did NOT postpone or call off the raid even after it knew, to an absolute certainty, that the supposed element of surprise had been taken away, since Koresh and his followers had been tipped off in advance that the raid was about to occur.
Thus, the purpose of the raid was NOT to surprise Koresh, or to take him peacefully. The purpose was to be as heavy handed, and as UNsubtle, as possible -- so that Koresh and his fellow "sleepers" could not possibly miss the message: "Either shape up and get back into line, or we will 'take you out' -- i.e., "WE WILL KILL YOU."
[Page 33]
Therefore, the fact that there was a gun battle on February 28th, and that 4 BATF officers, along with 6 cult members, were killed, was NOT a tragedy from the CIA's point of view. Those 10 deaths merely served to underscore the point they wanted to make to Koresh and his 6 fellow "sleepers" -- as well as to any other "sleepers" who might be getting out of line elsewhere across the country:
"Be prepared to carry out the orders we will give you, exactly as you have been pre-programmed to do, or you and all your loved ones will have hell to pay for your disobedience."
The deaths on February 28th also gave the government the excuse it needed to mount a permanent armed siege against the compound. After all (so the argument goes), how can you let ordinary citizens get away with killing 4 BATF agents in the line of duty?!
Never mind that the whole thing was set up precisely so that one or more BATF agents were guaranteed to be killed, in order to provide the continuing excuse for this military siege!
Therefore, the loss of life which occurred on February 28th played right into the CIA's hands, allowing it to blame Koresh and his followers for all the violence which had occurred -- as well as all of the far greater violence which was yet to come -- to desensitize the public to all that violence, and to build public acceptance of (and even support for) the proposition that the government "simply had no other choice" in dealing with Koresh and people like him.
The bottom line here is that this propaganda we were being fed by the CIA was to pave the way for a general acceptance of the imposition of martial law when situations like this "get out of hand" -- which is the way the CIA wants us to view its 51-day siege of the Branch Davidian compound in Waco.
FURTHER MIND CONTROL ASSAULTS ON KORESH AND HIS FELLOW "SLEEPERS" AFTER THE FEBRUARY 28TH BATF RAID
Since, as we have seen, the entire Waco incident grew out of the CIA's mind control programing of Koresh and his fellow "sleepers", it should not be at all surprising that such attempts to control the subconscious minds and wills of Koresh and his followers continued throughout the entire 51-day siege which followed the February 28th BATF raid.
Throughout the siege, for example, we were told each evening on the nightly news that the FBI was shining high-powered spotlights onto the compound at night, and bombarding those inside with various kinds of loud and obnoxious noises -- acid rock "music," Tibetan chants, Christmas songs, and the like -- in an attempt to annoy Koresh and his followers, to deprive them of their sleep, to make them cranky and irritable, and thus to make them more pliable to the FBI's demands that they surrender peacefully -- so that there would be NO loss of life. That's what we were told.
The truth, however, is far different.
[Page 34]
The truth is that these incessant loud and obnoxious noises -- the acid rock "music," Tibetan chants, Christmas songs, etc. -- were merely the cover or mask for what was really bombarding the compound and its occupants -- 20 gigahertz microwave transmissions, designed to be as stressful and destructive to the human physiology, inner ear, psyche, and mental stability as possible.
In short, the CIA has perfected the use of such high-intensity microwave transmissions on human subjects to such an extent they are absolutely certain that over time, such transmissions are beyond the ability of most human beings to endure, and that sooner or later, they will drive any normal person crazy -- literally -- or provoke him or her to suicide or murder.
One example of the CIA's use of there high-intensity microwave transmissions on a human subject occurred during the U.S. invasion of Panama, when General Manuel Noriega fled to the Vatican Embassy for sanctuary. What the pre reported was that the military bombarded the Vatican Embassy with very loud acid "rock "music." What they didn't tell us was that that "music" was, again, only the mask to cover what was really being beamed at General Noriega -- these same high-intensity microwave transmissions known to be beyond the limits of most human beings to endure -- at least over any extended period of time.
And remember, that at the Branch Davidian compound, these high-intensity microwave transmissions continued, almost without interruption, day and night, throughout the entire length of the 51-day siege -- and that there were more than 20 children in the compound all this time!
No wonder you were concerned about the gross mistreatment of these children, Attorney General Reno! But what the Reagan and bush holdovers in the Justice Department, FBI, and BATF failed to tell you was that it was our own FBI and CIA who were responsible for mistreating these children -- through these high-intensity microwave transmissions bombarding the compound for 51 days!
Also included in these bombarding transmissions were neuro linguistic programming and other subliminal messages designed to reach the subconscious minds of Koresh and his 6 fellow "sleepers," in order to reassert the CIA's commands and domination.
But to Koresh's credit, he was able to withstand all these bombarding transmissions personally, and was also able to hold the other members of his group together, and to help each of them withstand the onslaught, as well.
Having talked with persons who have been through such CIA mind control techniques, and such high-intensity microwave bombardment, I can tell you that preserving one's sanity and stability in the face of such an incessant onslaught -- especially one which lasted 51 days -- was no small accomplishment for David Koresh. Indeed, it showed enormous stamina, courage, and leadership on his part to hold himself and all the other members of his group together as a cohesive unit all this time.
Indeed, Koresh's ability to withstand this incessant onslaught is undoubtedly the one thing which angered the CIA and the FBI more than anything else. They had earlier subjected him to intensive mind control programming. Now they were throwing everything at him they knew how. And yet, through it all, he was able to stand -- proud, tall, and defiant -- and to hold his entire group together as a cohesive unit. That was no small accomplishment!
[Page 35]
That ability and determination to withstand even the most intense adversity is apparently what made those in charge of the siege angry beyond all comprehension. And that official anger and frustration apparently is what led to the final, fatal assault on the compound on Monday, April 19th.
THE PENULTIMATE PLAN BY "THE DELTA FORCE"
Before we get to a discussion of what actually happened on April 19th, however, there was one penultimate plan to end the siege which was proposed to you, Attorney General Reno (according to what I have been told), which you apparently turned down -- only 2 to 3 weeks before that final fateful Monday, April 19th. This plan, had it gone forward, would have involved the following:
#1) The plan would have been carried out by "The Delta Force" -- an elite commando-type military unit composed of specially trained members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marines, operating under the command of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the CIA;
#2) It would have involved a night raid on the compound, when the place was pitch black -- NOT illuminated by the usual spotlights;
#3) It would have been carried out by crack commandos dressed all in black;
#4) It would have depended for its success on the elements of surprise, lightning-quick speed, and precise execution;
#5) And it would have resulted in the vast majority of the 95 men, women, and children in the compound at the time being brought out alive, safe, and unharmed.
There was, however, one other crucial element of this plan which was highly controversial, but upon which the commanders of "The Delta Force" and the CIA were most insistent. And IF you were informed of this element, Attorney General Reno -- though I seriously doubt that you were -- this may well have been why you reportedly rejected the plan, and refused to go forward with it.
#6) This last element was that the members of "The Delta Force" were to bring everyone out alive -- except for David Koresh and his six (6) fellow CIA "sleepers". Those 7 men were to be killed -- no questions asked -- period.
For under NO circumstances were these 7 ever to be allowed to testify in a Court of law or otherwise to reveal to the public what they knew about the CIA's secret mind control programing or its "Manchurian Candidate type" robot assassins.
In other words, this "Delta Force" plan, had it been allowed to proceed, would have been a CIA "wet" operation -- carried out by some of the CIA's top professional killers, fittingly dressed in all black garb, to "take out" these 7 CIA "sleepers" once and for all, so that their potentially explosive testimony concerning the CIA's secret mind control program would be silenced forever.
[Page 36]
That is what would have happened if this penultimate plan had been approved, and had been allowed to go forward -- 2 to 3 weeks before the ultimate end on April 19th. But as we shall see, that is really not much different from what actually did happen on April 29th --
in that the operation was, in fact, carried out by four (4) of the CIA's top professional killers, dressed in all black garb --
only this time, it was done in broad daylight (but nevertheless under such secret conditions that the truth of what really happened would remain hidden from the American public) --
and this time, not just seven (7) CIA "sleepers" were murdered -- all 86 men, women, and children in the compound -- i.e., everyone but those select few whom the CIA had targeted to be saved -- were murdered -- in such a way that it all could be rationalized as "just another mass suicide like Jonestown" -- thereby piling one gross CIA lie upon another.
WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED IN WACO ON APRIL 19TH, 1993
This brings us then to what actually happened at the Branch Davidian compound on Monday, April 19th, 1993.
You have reported to the nation, Attorney General Reno, that you met with President Clinton on Sunday, April 18th, and that after outlining the plan you had been given to him, and going over it in some detail, he told you to go ahead -- IF YOU THOUGHT THIS WAS THE RIGHT THING TO DO.
You have also reported to the nation that having given the ultimate go ahead for the plan, you (and President Clinton) are the ones ultimately responsible for what happened in Waco on Monday, April 19th, 1993.
That, however, is simply NOT true, Attorney General Reno. What happened in Waco is NOT your fault. Nor is it President Clinton' s fault. For, the Reagan and Bush holdovers at the Justice Department, the FBI, the BATF, and the CIA, etc., who carefully planned and orchestrated this disaster, never informed you as to what their secret right-wing political agenda was in all this. Therefore, neither you nor President Clinton had any idea what had actually been planned for this operation in Waco -- much less any hint of the secret agenda which was to be served by this mass murder and cover up to protect the criminal machinations of the CIA.
What actually happened in Waco, according to the information I have been given, is as follows:
#1) As early as Sunday afternoon or evening, April 18th (shortly after your conference with President Clinton), calls went in to Parkland Hospital in Dallas -- the very same hospital where President Kennedy was taken after his assassination in Dealey Plaza on November 22nd, 1963 -- again, at the hands of CIA Professional killers -- to be prepared to receive a large number of serious burn victims from Waco the following day.
[Page 37]
#2) On the morning of April 19th, the same "Delta Force" commando team -- actually, a select group of the CIA's top professional killers -- which would have carried out what I have referred to above as "the penultimate plan," had it been approved -- was on the ground in Waco to carry out all aspects of the "wet" operation planned for that Monday.
#3) This mass murder was then to be covered up and made to look like a "mass suicide -- just like Jonestown" -- thereby layering one monstrous CIA lie upon another -- since both Waco and Jonestown were CIA mass murders, and NOT mass suicides.
#4) This "Delta Force" group was composed of 15 men in all, headed by a Lieutenant Colonel who was a CIA liaison officer. The group flew into Texas on their own C-130 transport plane, parked it either at the Waco or Dallas airport all day, and then departed once their "dirty work" had been completed. The plane belonged to "Triangle."
#5) Among the.15 men in this larger group, .there were two (2) smaller operational teams -- the 4-man team which actually made the insertion into the compound, as described in detail below, and a back-up team, which apparently was never used.
#6) These men were dressed all in black -- black pants, black shoes, black jackets, black gas masks, black gloves -- very poetic for a "black" (or "wet") operation -- and were dressed to look like all of the other FBI officers on the ground -- probably even wearing jackets with FBI insignias on them (though I am not certain of this), so that to any outside observer, there would have been virtually no way of telling these 4 men apart from any of the other federal officers on the scene at the time.
#7) The whole nation watched on TV that morning as the FBI used M1-A1 tanks to punch holes in the exterior walls of the compound's living quarters. We were later told that at the same time they had battered down these walls, the tanks had also lobbed massive quantities of a very virulent form of tear gas into the compound.
#8) This tear gas had been designed to be used for crowd control -- i.e., it was so virulent and irritating that even in a fresh air, out-of-doors situation, it was guaranteed to cause people to flee from its presence instantly simply in order to be able to breathe.
#9) Now, it was being used in a closed, indoor, living quarters situation where 95 men, women, and children were trapped inside. The logical expectation would have been that all 95 of these persons would have fled out-of-doors instantly, just to be able to breathe. But strangely, not a single person came out of the compound -- even after this noisome substance had been poured into the compound in enormous quantities over a period of several hours.
#10) The logical question therefore arises: Why? Why did not ANY of these 95 men, women, and children --- particularly, the women and their children -- instantly flee for fresh air into the out of doors?
[Page 38]
The answer we have been given by the news media and the official FBI spokesmen is that David Koresh and his cult members had stockpiled and outfitted themselves with gas masks.
TEAR GAS -- AND NERVE GAS -- WERE USED
#11) The real truth, however, is much more sinister and cold-blooded. For what actually happened here is that the tear gas -- as virulent and noisome as it was -- was only the mask or cover for the real, active ingredient being propelled by the tanks into the compound.
What was actually propelled into the compound was a nerve reagent -- a neuro toxin -- NERVE GAS -- a virulent poisonous substance, like curare -- which instantly paralyzed and rendered totally helpless and defenseless all of the 95 men, women, and children inside the compound -- except for those 9, later rescued, like David Thibideaux, who were on the 2nd or 3rd floor with their windows wide open on both sides, and who were thus spared the deadly effects of this tear gas/nerve gas combination.
For all the others, that could no longer coordinate their muscles in the effort required even just to get up, much less to flee to the life-sustaining fresh air outside, only a few feet away.
This is an extremely serious matter, Attorney General Reno. For it means that here the U.S. military, the FBI, and the Justice Department -- all directed by the CIA -- used nerve gas on innocent men, women, and children in our civilian population -- and then proceeded to murder them in cold blood, as is set forth in detail below. This clearly rises to the level of War Crimes on a civilian population during peace time, an unspeakable human rights violation.
And it was committed by our "intelligence" community against innocent men, women, and children -- simply to bury the truth concerning the CIA's criminal use of mind control programing to "manufacture" "Manchurian Candidate type" robot assassins, whose very existence is an unspeakable outrage, in and of itself.
THE "DELTA FORCE" TEAM ENTERS THE COMPOUND
#12) After this deadly tear gas/nerve gas combination had had time to do its debilitating and paralyzing work on all the men, women, and children in the compound, the 4-man "Delta Force" team -- actually some of the CIA's top professional assassins -- made its entry into the compound. Fittingly, for a "black" operation, they were dressed all in black, from head to toe, as stated above.
[Page 39]
#13) They were dropped onto the roof of the compound by one of the several low-flying. heavily armed military helicopters which hovered overhead throughout much of the day -- while all of the television cameras were focused on the outside of the building at ground level -- for example, focusing on the tanks which had just lobbed the tear gas/nerve gas combination into the building. The actual Insertion into the building came at approximately 10:25 AM.
#14) Before they entered the compound, however, this 4-man team of assassins had received shots of atropine, the antidote to the nerve gas, so that they too, would NOT be overcome and paralyzed by it.
#15) According to testimony given before the House Judiciary Committee on the day of your testimony, Attorney General Reno, the fires in the Branch Davidian compound did not become visible until approximately 11:45 AM that morning. This means that the team had something in the neighborhood of one (1) hour and fifteen (15) minutes, or so, in which to do their "dirty work," and then to make their escape.
#16) The Murder of David Koresh:
One of the first things they did, obviously, was to go into the so-called communications center, just off the kitchen, where they found, and quickly subdued and killed, David Koresh, along with any of his close associates who were nearby. Koresh was killed with a single bullet to the middle of the forehead, about an inch above the eyes, fired from a distance of about 4 inches away.
In this regard, an article on page A-3 of The Washington Post, on Tuesday, May 18th, 1993, is directly relevant. It quotes noted forensic pathologist, Dr. Cyril H. Wecht of Pittsburgh, who recently completed an independent autopsy of the bodies of David Koresh and Steve Schneider, one of his chief lieutenants, as saying that the gunshot wound in the middle of the forehead, which killed Koresh, and the gunshot wound in the back of the head, which killed Schneider, are "not typical of suicide."
And no wonder! They were, in fact, NOT killed by suicide at all. This was a calculated, carefully planned, cold-blooded mass murder, carried out with precision, by the one of the best teams of professional assassins this nation has to offer!
Note also that the FBI's psychological profile of Koresh showed him NOT to be suicidal -- and the FBI (through the CIA) had access to all of the relevant information on him, dating back to, and including, his programming to become one of the CIA's "Manchurian Candidate type" robot assassins. They must have known, even that early on, that the normal "self-destruct" programmed response implanted into the subconscious psyche of most CIA "sleepers" would NOT work on Koresh.
Consider also the point made by a teenage girl, on the NBC Nightly News, Tuesday, May 4th, 1993, who had been a member of the Branch Davidian cult in Waco until shortly before the April 19th disaster. She stated in this interview that all of the children in the compound were repeatedly grilled by Koresh on precisely how to commit suicide -- either by taking cyanide poison, or by gunshot.
[Page 40]
But she said Koresh always insisted that you must put the gun IN YOUR MOUTH before pulling the trigger. 'If you put the gun to your temple, there is always the danger that you might survive [as a vegetable]."
If this was the message which Koresh so carefully taught everyone in the compound over a number of years, is it probable that Koresh himself, and all of the other men around him who died by gunfire, would have committed "suicide" by shooting themselves in some manner other than the one they had so carefully drummed into their children's minds over all those years?! For apparently, not a single one of the persons who died of gunshot wounds died of a bullet wound to the roof of his or her mouth!
#17) From the communications center, the "wet" team then fanned out throughout the rest of the compound, and methodically "took out" (i.e., murdered) all of the other six (6) CIA "sleepers" they would have killed earlier, in what I have called "the penultimate plan," had that plan been allowed to go forward, plus a number of other persons along the way.
According to an article on page A-18 of The New York Times on Wednesday, May 5th, 1993, two-thirds of the bodies autopsied thus far -- more than 2 dozen then, and still counting -- have bullet wounds in them of some kind which the medical examiners say were inflicted after the date of the initial BATF raid on February 28th.
It is highly likely that ALL of these gunshot wounds were inflicted by this team of CIA assassins, as they went throughout the compound doing their pre-assigned "dirty work."
This same article in the New York Times also states that it appears that at least 17 of the children were killed by means of poisonous injections. Although I have no specific information on that point, all my other information -- including the fact that everyone else in the building, except those 9 who had been targeted to be saved -- were paralyzed by the nerve gas and thus had been rendered incapable of moving at all -- strongly suggests that these children were likewise "taken out" by this CIA "wet" team.
HOW THE FIRES WERE STARTED
#18) The remaining task for this "wet" team -- after the multiple murders, described above, had been carried out -- while they were still inside, was to place 3 or 4 canisters of "Willie Peter" (White phosphorus) in strategic locations throughout the compound in order to start the fires.
These canisters were all equipped with delayed timing devices, all set to go off simultaneously -- apparently at or shortly before 11:45 AM, since that's when the fires were actually sighted by outside observers on the scene.
[Page 41]
White phosphorus is one of the most fearsome incendiary devices imaginable, and is therefore a favorite of CIA's "wet" teams. It ignites instantly, immediately burns with white hot intensity, and consumes, beyond all recognition, everything in its path -- thereby destroying all possible forensic evidence -- and covering, as well as one can possibly imagine, the trail of assassins (like this particular "wet" team) who want to try to claim later that their actual mass murder was merely a "mass suicide" or a "tragic accident."
CIA "wet" teams have also been known to corner their intended targets into a closed quarter, and then throw "Willie Peter" into their midst, so that these victims are instantly immolated right before the team's eyes.
The fire which "Willie Peter" produces is so intense, and the combustion so complete, that victims -- as was the case here in Waco -- can only be identified by their dental records.
But here, because the team itself was inside the closed quarters, they had to use delayed timing devices on the "Willie Peter" canisters -- to give themselves time to make their own exit before the entire compound was consumed in the monumental conflagration we all watched in horror on television.
#19) Notice that this explanation of how the fires started comports with the observations on the scene -- with what the television cameras at ground level recorded, and with what the military helicopters and their infrared cameras overhead observed -- i.e., that 3 or 4 fires started simultaneously at different places in the compound. And then these separate fires spread rapidly (because of the wood construction, the straw which was everywhere, the high winds, and the white hot "Willie Peter" incendiary devices which had started these separate blazes in the first place), until they united into cohesive whole, involving the entire compound, which became far more destructive than the sum of these separate smaller fires, until it ultimately became a massive conflagration which consumed everything in sight.
One possible contrary explanation, which has been offered by commentators and "tragic accident" theory advocates, is that the tear gas sprayed into the compound by the tanks
[ignoring the fact that what was injected was NOT just tear gas, but a tear gas/nerve gas combination]
was itself a combustible substance, that one of the tanks, in punching holes in the exterior walls, had accidentally knocked over a kerosine lantern or container, and that the kerosine had then ignited the tear gas, which then resulted in the conflagration.
This "tragic accident" theory, however, simply does NOT square with the known facts, preserved on video tape, because the compound did NOT explode into a massive fire ball all at once (as would have been the case if the tear gas itself had been combustible, and had been ignited by a torch, like lighted kerosine).
[Page 42]
#20) The other point to be made here is that, while the "wet" team did kill many of those inside the compound prior to setting the fires (by means of the"Willie Peter" canisters on delayed timing devices, discussed above), they apparently did NOT murder (at least, directly) ALL of the 86 men, women, and children who ultimately died in the tragedy -- meaning that many of those who died were left paralyzed by the nerve gas, unable to get up or free themselves from this disaster in progress, and were thus consigned to being consumed alive in the giant conflagration brought on by the white phosphorus.
And those consigned to this horrible fiery fate -- being burned alive -- apparently included men, women, and children.
NOTE WELL
#21) The bottom line here is that 86 men, women, and children died - i.e., they were murdered -- in the Branch Davidian compound on Monday, April 19th, 1993 -- ALL at the hands of the 4 members of this CIA "wet" team, operating under the cover of "The Delta Force."
#22) The bottom line is also that high ranking officials in our government --
though NOT yourself, Attorney General Reno, and NOT President Clinton --
including senior Reagan and Bush Administration holdovers in the Justice Department, the FBI, the BATF, the Pentagon, and the CIA -- all knew in advance that this Waco operation was designed from the start to be a mass murder in which only those few individuals whom the CIA had targeted in advance to be saved would be allowed to survive -- and that ALL of the other 86 men, women, and children in the compound would be murdered in cold blood by these CIA-Delta Force assassins.
#23) I mentioned on page 30 above that one of the uses the CIA makes of its mind control sophistication is to implant memory blocks into the subconscious memories of its top professional assassins -- in order to allow them to live with what they have done, and NOT to be overcome by flashbacks and nightmares of their "handiwork".
Note Well: But I have been informed that those memory blocks are NOT holding very well in this instance --
and that some or all of the four (4) members of this particular "wet" team are sickened by what they were ordered to do, and what they did, in fact, "accomplish," in Waco on April 19th. To these hardened, seasoned, professional assassins, it was all "too easy." The people inside the compound (as a result of the nerve gas) simply "never had a chance."
[Page 43]
THE CHAIN OF COMMAND IN ORDERING THESE MURDERS
THE "SHADOW GOVERNMENT"
Which Has Run Our Country in Absolute Secrecy
UNACCOUNTABLE TO ANYONE
For At Least The Past 30 Years
But who was it who ordered the vicious murders of these 86 men, women and children? It certainly was NOT you, Attorney General Reno! Or President Clinton! Even tough yau are the only two officials in the publicly acknowledged chain of command with the power to authorize those operations in Waco.
And even though both you and President Clinton have stepped forward, admirably, to say, "The buck stops here -- I accept full responsibility," no one can seriously imagine that if you or President Clinton had had any inkling of what was actually in store here, that either one of you, much less both of you in combination, would ever have even considered approving such an operation.
So, if the decision was NOT made through the normal, publicly acknowledged chain of command, how then was it made? And by whom?
The answer to this question brings up the whole issue of covert, "black," and "wet" operations, and who has the authority to order agents or employees of our government to murder, in cold blood, men, women, and children who are citizens of this nation -- in gross violation of their constitutional and human rights, not to mention all of the relevant federal and state criminal statutes, and the legal, moral, and ethical principles upon which our nation was founded?
So, who else, besides you and the President, could have ordered this mass murder? The answer lies in the top secret chain of command underlying all of the major covert and "black" operations which have been carried out by the CIA's myriad "wet" teams over the past 30 years or so.
The answer is that such decisions are made by persons who consider themselves -- both individually and collectively -- to be TOTALLY ABOVE THE LAW -- particularly when it comes to their top secret chain of command. For in practice, for at least the past 30 years, these men have successfully remained totally unaccountable to any civilian or judicial authority of any kind, either in this nation or elsewhere around the world.
More specifically, this chain of command of the persons who authorized and approved -- and indeed ordered and carried out -- this Waco "wet" operation is as follows:
(a) The "wet" team itself is at the lowest level in this chain of command.
Notice that the "wet" teams in this command structure are the functional equivalent in this country of what is referred to in Third World countries and so-called "banana republics" as ROVING RIGHT-WING DEATH SQUADS.
[Page 44]
(b) Then, there is the intervening "intelligence" community chain of command -- on the top-secret, covert ("black") operations side of the Central Intelligence Agency and all of the other interrelating clandestine "intelligence" organizations (including secret units in the Justice Department, the FBI, the Pentagon, and the State Department, etc.) -- all still manned by the Bush and Reagan holdovers referred to above -- all the way up to and including the Director of Central Intelligence and the Joint Chiefs of Staff;
(c) And then above the DCI and the Joint Chiefs, at the very pinnacle of power, sits a top secret council of nine (9) men -- whose names I do not know, and would not recognize even if I stumbled across them -- but who nevertheless have the power, and who regularly exercise this power -- to order the "termination with extreme prejudice" of any person on earth -- up to and including the President of the United States.
This top secret council, which I assume, is composed primarily, if not exclusively, of present and/or former high-level military and/or "intelligence" officials of our government, is strictly an "unofficial" body, and therefore, since it does NOT "officially" even exist, can NEVER be held accountable to anyone for ANY of its actions or decisions.
This unofficial council constitutes what might be called our "SHADOW GOVERNMENT." Its existence, though shrouded in total secrecy, is nevertheless very real. And its power, corruptive influence, and destructive force on the history and course of this nation, and, indeed, the whole world, have been, and still are enormous -- sometime even catastrophic.
Consider, for example, the words of L. Fletcher Prouty, a retired Colonel in the United States Air Force, who served as the Chief of Special Operations for the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and CIA liaison officer, during the Kennedy Administration, in his new book:
JFK -- the CIA, Vietnam, and the Plot to Assassinate John F. Kennedy (Birch Lane Press) (1992),
when discussing the secret workings of this "SHADOW GOVERNMENT" and the CIA:
(1) "Last there are still some among us who believe that the President runs the country, that the Congress participates effectively in determining the course of its destiny, and that the Supreme Court assures compliance with the Constitution and all federal laws, let them witness [the handiwork of this "Shadow Government" and the CIA] and the results of this blatant disregard for all elements of government, as we find it on the record." Page 56.
(2) "The real power structures are always the invisible ones behind the visible sovereign power." Page 2.
(3) "The CIA today is a far cry from the agency that was created in 1947 by the National Security Act.
[Page 45]
"As President Harry S. Truman confided to close friends, the greatest mistake of his administration took place when he signed that National Security Act of 1947 into law. It was the act which, among other things, ... created the Central Intelligence Agency." Page 10.
(4) "By the early 1950's, former President Harry S. Truman was saying that when he signed the CIA legislation into law, he made the biggest mistake of his presidency.
"In those same years, President Eisenhower had similar thoughts, and he did everything he could to place reasonable controls on the Agency. Both of these men feared the CIA because of its power to operate in secrecy and without proper accountability." Page 97.
(5) President John F. Kennedy had similar thoughts, and indeed "planned to splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces, and to scatter it to the winds." [This was one of the principal reasons why he was assassinated not long after making his intentions toward the Agency known.] Page 286.
Note Well: [Half or more of the Secret Service agents guarding the President are reportedly also employees of the CIA -- and, when push comes to shove, will give their primary loyalty to the CIA. This means that when the "Shadow Government" orders the assassination of the President -- as has happened twice in our lifetimes, in the cases of President Kennedy and President Reagan -- the Secret Service agents protecting the President will "stand down" (or to look the other way), when ordered to do so, to allow the assassination to proceed.]
(6) "The power of any agency that is allowed to operate in secrecy is boundless. The CIA knows this, and it has used its power to its own advantage." Page 154.
(7) "The CIA has learned to hide behind its best cover -- that is, that it is an 'intelligence' agency -- when actually it devours [far] more money, more time, more manpower, and more effort in support of ... covert ... activities all over the world (not to mention within this country) [than it does in support of 'intelligence' gathering]." Page 230.
In other words, the primary purpose and function of the CIA is NOT to gather "intelligence," but to carry out covert, "black," and "wet" operations -- both in this country and around the world. And the whole reason for keeping these operations shrouded in such secrecy is that they are highly illegal -- indeed, blatantly criminal -- and if the American public were simply told the truth, they would quickly rise up in anger and put the CIA out of business!
And remember that the CIA has had the audacity to emblazon across its rotunda the words of Jesus, "You shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free!" (John 8:32) -- when the actual intentions of the Agency, quite obviously, are that the American people shall NEVER be told the truth, so that they will, in fact, NEVER be free of the secret control of the CIA and the "Shadow Government" over their lives.
[Page 46]
THE "HANDIWORK" OF OUR "SHADOW GOVERNMENT"
Having identified the command structure of this "Shadow Government" as well as I can at the moment --
the 16 covert operatives who wish to come forward will identify it, and the persons involved, in far greater detail and specificity, once they are finally given the opportunity to testify --
let us now look at some of its "handiwork." Jesus said that we should always judge individuals and groups by their "fruits" -- i.e., by the work they do, the way they live their lives, their accomplishments, and the legacy they leave behind. (Matthew 7:16).
The following is just a brief partial list of some of the more grotesque "handiwork" and "fruits" this "Shadow Government" and its myriad "wet" teams have left behind as their ongoing and continuing "legacy" over the past 30 years:
(1) The actual or attempted assassinations of each of the following leaders of this country:
(a) President John F. Kennedy, on November 22nd, 1963;
plus as many as 175 or more key witnesses over the intervening years who could have testified to the truth as to what actually happened in his assassination;
(b) Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., on April 4th, 1968;
plus numerous witnesses over the years who could have testified as to the truth of what actually happened;
(c) Senator Robert F. Kennedy, on June 5th, 1968;
plus numerous witnesses over the years who could have testified as to the truth of what actually happened;
(d) Malcolm X, in the early 1960's;
(e) Alabama Governor George Wallace, on ___, 1972;
(f) J. Edgar Hoover and his close associate, Mr. Tolson, in the early 1970's, in the midst of the "Watergate" scandal;
(g) Martha Mitchell, the wife of the Attorney General John Mitchell, also in the early 1970's, because she threatened to blow the lid of "Watergate" and much more;
(h) President Ronald Reagan, on March 31st, 1981;
(i) Beatles' lead singer and songwriter John Lennon, on ____;
[Page 47]
(j) Senator John Tower (R-Texas), on ___, when his private airplane was blown out of the sky -- when he threatened to come forward with what he knew of the role of George Bush and others in the "October Surprise" and Iran-Contra scandals -- see page 69 below;
(k) Senator John Heinz (R-Pa), on ____, when his private airplane was blown out of the sky by a missile fired from a helicopter flying just below (the debris from the plane explosion fell on the helicopter, causing it to crash also) -- when he likewise threatened to come forward with what he knew of the role of George Bush and others in the "October Surprise" and Iran-Contra scandals -- see page 69 below;
(l) Congressman Ted Weiss (D-NY), on ____, 1992, when he refused to remain silent about what he knew of the role of George Bush and others in the "October Surprise" and Iran-Contra scandals;
plus, again, numerous witnesses over the years who could have testified as to the truth of what actually happened in any one or more of these political assassinations;
(2) The actual or attempted assassinations of numerous leaders of foreign countries around the world;
(3) The murder of Black Panther leaders Fred Hampton and Mark Clark on the West Side of Chicago in the 1960's;
(4) The murder of 914 men, women, and children, in Jonestown, Guyana, in the mid-1970's;
(5) The murder of a much smaller number of men, women, and children in the Black "MOVE" community in Philadelphia in the mid-1980's;
(6) The murder of 248 American soldiers (plus a crew of 8) who were returning home for Christmas from a tour of duty as "Peacekeepers" in the Middle East, on December 12, 1985, when their plane was blown out of the sky over Gander, Newfoundland;
(7) The murder of more than 250 men, women, and children on December 21, 1988, when Pan Am Flight #103 was blown out of the sky over Lockerbie, Scotland;
(8) The murder of 269 men, women, and children (240 passengers, and 29 crew members) on August 31, 1983, when Korean Airlines Flight #007 was blown out of the sky over the ocean on its way from Anchorage, Alaska to Seoul, Korea -- NOT by the Soviets, but again, by our own CIA;
(9) The "October Surprise" treason by which George Bush, Ronald Reagan, and a selected group of present and former CIA covert operatives rigged, and thus stole, the 1980 U.S. Presidential Election on November 4th, 1980;
plus the murder of approximately 50 or so witnesses over the years who could have testified as to the truth of what actually happened in the "October Surprise" and Iran-Contra scandals;
[Page 48]
(10) The Inslaw Bankruptcy scandal, the "fixing" of that case in the District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals, and the wholesale theft from its rightful owners of the "PROMIS" software by the U.S. Justice Department and the larger "intelligence" community, followed by the illegal alteration of that software and its pirated sales to intelligence organizations, police departments, and governments all over the world;
plus the murder of numerous witnesses -- including Danny Casolaro and a number of other persons -- who could have testified as to the truth of what actually happened in the Inslaw case and numerous interrelated scandals.
Note Well: By the way, Attorney General Reno, I strongly suspect that the report you received not long ago on the Inslaw case from former Chicago Federal District Judge Nicholas Bua
(who was appointed by former President Bush and former Attorney General Barr to conduct a so-called independent "investigation" -- as a way around their having to appoint an independent counsel)
is highly unreliable, if out outright false and fraudulent. I know Judge Bua personally, and can testify from bitter first-hand personal experience that he is a first rate crook and thief -- the very embodiment of a thoroughly corrupt Judge. Also, there is no way bush and Barr would have selected him to conduct this "investigation" in the first place, unless he had already agreed ahead of time NOT to find or expose ANY of the real truth.
Therefore, I strongly suspect that Judge Bua's report to you is nothing more than a further chapter in the ongoing saga of the official cover up, obfuscation, and obstruction of justice which have characterized the history of the Inslaw case from its inception.
(11) The wholesale bribery of Congress and high officials in the Administration -- first by the Korean CIA (fronting for the American CIA) and then by BCCI (also closely linked to the American CIA);
plus the murder of numerous witnesses who could have testified as to the truth of what actually happened in these scandals;
(12) The wholesale theft of billions and billions of dollars from the Savings & Loans Associations and Banks of this country by the "intelligence" community -- with the proceeds of this massive thievery largely used to fund the illegal "black" operations which are the subject matter of this section of this letter;
(13) Illegal gun running (out of this country), illegal drug smuggling (back into this country), and illegal money laundering (in both directions) -- all on a massive scale by the "intelligence" community -- again with the proceeds of this massive criminality largely used to fund the illegal "black" operations which are the subject matter of this section of this letter;
[Page 49]
(14) The recent murders outside the CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia in January of this year, and the bombing of the World Trade Center in New York City shortly thereafter -- once again, the American people have NOT been told the truth of what actually happened here;
(15) The wholesale corruption of our federal Courts -- particularly the U.S. Bankruptcy Courts (and the Courts which sit in review over them) in many of the major metropolitan areas across this country (such as Chicago, New York, San Francisco, etc.) -- and the wholesale "fixing" of cases therein, in order to "sanitize" and put the imprimatur of the Court on the wholesale theft of very valuable assets from the formerly middle class, and to transfer there assets (and the concentration of wealth and power which thereby accrues) to the super-rich predators who control at least this portion of our federal Court system;
(16) The rigging in Congress and the Justice Department of ALL previous attempts to investigate ANY of these assassinations, murders, and various other major scandals -- including, where necessary, the murdering of key witnesses who could have testified as to the truth of what was being investigated, or could have exposed the official cover up and obstruction of justice being used to bury the truth and the innocent victims in order to protect the guilty;
(17) The rigid control over the major media in this country so that they will almost NEVER cover or investigate ANY of the real scandals enumerated here (except in ways which totally obfuscate the truth), or report to the American public ANY of the true facts or root causes of the massive interrelated corruption which permeates so much of the top levels of governmental power in this country -- much less to report even the existence, not to mention the inner workings, or "handiwork," of this "Shadow Government";
(18) And finally (last, but by no means least), the fomenting of rebellions and civil wars in various countries around the world for the specific purpose of eventually bringing about the massive intervention of the United States military into these "hot spots" -- including, but not limited to:
(a) The war in Vietnam, where more than 58,000 U.S. Servicemen lost their lives, countless hundreds of thousand of others suffered serious or permanent injury, and the nation as a whole squandered a major portion of its wealth and treasury.
See, for example, L. Fletcher Prouty's new book, cited and quoted from on page 45 and 46 above, in which Mr. Prouty spends at least half of his work demonstrating that the CIA, through the "leadership" of General (and CIA station chief) Edward G. Lansdale, beginning in June, 1954, just one month after the defeat of the French at Dien Bien Phu, worked for a solid 10 years to destabilize the government and society of South Vietnam, and to foment the armed clash between North and South Vietnam which eventually provided the excuse for America's massive military entry -- via the fraudulent Gulf of Tonkin Resolution -- into that civil war by Lyndon Johnson, immediately following the CIA's assassination of President John F. Kennedy.
[Page 50]
Note Well: (b) The present civil war in Bosnia -- where the CIA, employing many of the same clandestine procedures and techniques used in Vietnam from 1954 to 1964, is again doing its best to provoke a situation which will provide the excuse for another massive intervention of the U.S. Military -- which, if it occurs, will again result in the needless loss of life of thousands of American soldiers, and the pointless squandering of much of our nation's wealth and treasury on yet another "no win" war.
Commenting on how the CIA is used specifically for the purpose of getting the U.S. involved in large-scale military conflicts, Fletcher Prouty states, on page 30:
"This is one of the secret methods of the secret war. These special [CIA] armed forces are used as agitators.
"It is as though the fire department were being used to start fires, the police department employed to steal and kill, and doctors ordered to make people sick, to destroy their brains, to poison them.
"Such clandestine operations are designed to make war -- even when [we] have to play both sides at the same time" [in order to incite a civil war which ultimately provides the excuse for a massive intervention by the U.S. military].
THE RELEVANCE OF ALL THIS TO WHAT HAPPENED IN WACO
The point to be made here, Attorney General Reno, is that the RICO conspiracy which is responsible for the murders of the 86 men, women, and children in the Branch Davidian compound in Waco, Texas, on the morning of Monday, April 19th, 1993 (see pages 12 to 16, and 37 to 43 above), is the very same RICO conspiracy -- and in many instances, has even been ordered and carried out by some of the same decision makers and "wet" teams -- who have been involved in some or all of the high level assassinations, murders, and other atrocities enumerated as Items #1 through #18 on pages 47 through 51 above.
This is why I refer to this "Shadow Government," and the individuals and interlocking groups which comprise it, as "the Mother of all corruption." For, the tentacles of this giant RICO conspiracy extend all across our nation and reach into all levels and functions of the federal government.
And in each instance, this "Shadow Government" operates those functions of government which it controls in the same manner that organized crime uses to run its myriad criminal racketeering enterprises.
Indeed, that is the whole point here -- that this "Shadow Government" conducts the business of government, NOT in an open, honest, legitimate, and forthright manner, according to the laws, Constitution, and democratic principles of the United State, but rather in a secret, clandestine, and utterly illegal manner, as if they were running a criminal racketeering enterprise, in order to accomplish their own Right-wing political agenda.
[Part 2]